Back

Differences in early life cognitive function explain the association between low education and early dementia risk

Bratsberg, B.; Fjell, A. M. M.; Rogeberg, O. J.; Skirbekk, V. F.; WALHOVD, K. B.

2024-06-17 neurology
10.1101/2024.06.15.24308968 medRxiv
Show abstract

Major initiatives are currently attempting to prevent dementia by targeting modifiable risk factors. Low education is frequently pointed to as a potential key factor, due to its robust relationship with dementia risk. Impact of education is notoriously difficult to assess, however, because of associations with multiple other risk and protective factors, and large population-representative samples are required to tease the relationships apart. Here, we studied 207,814 Norwegian men born between 1950 and 1959 who underwent compulsory cognitive testing during military conscription as young adults, to systematically test associations of education, cognition, and other potentially important factors. While low education was associated with increased risk for dementia diagnosis (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.37, CI: 1.17-1.60), this association was fully explained by earlier cognitive test scores (HR = 1.08, CI: .91-1.28). In contrast, low cognitive score was associated with double risk of later dementia diagnosis, even when taking education into account (HR = 2.00, CI: 1.65-2.42). This relationship survived controlling for early-life socioeconomic status and was replicated within pairs of brothers. The latter finding suggests that genetic and environmental factors shared within families, such as common genetics, parental education, childhood socioeconomic status, or other shared experiences, cannot account for the association. Rather, independent, non-familial factors are more important. In contrast, within-family factors accounted for the relationship between low education and diagnosis risk. In conclusion, implementing measures to increase cognitive function in childhood and adolescence appears to be a more promising strategy for reducing dementia burden.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
5
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
12
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
17
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
19
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%