The continuous differentiation of multiscale structural gradients from childhood to adolescence correlates with the maturation of cortical morphology and functional specialization
He, Y.; Zeng, D.; Li, Q.; Chu, L.; Dong, X.; Liang, X.; Sun, L.; Liao, X.; Zhao, T.; Chen, X.; Lei, T.; Men, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Hu, M.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, N.; Tan, S.; Gao, J.-H.; Qin, S.; Tao, S.; Dong, Q.; He, Y.; Li, S.
Show abstract
From childhood to adolescence, the structural organization of the human brain undergoes dynamic and regionally heterogeneous changes across multiple scales, from synaptic pruning to the reorganization of large-scale anatomical wiring. However, during this period, the developmental process of multiscale structural architecture, its association with cortical morphological changes, and its role in the maturation of functional organization remain largely unknown. Here, we utilized a longitudinal multimodal imaging dataset including 276 children aged 6 to 14 years to investigate the developmental process of multiscale cortical wiring. We used an in vivo model of cortical wiring that combines features of white matter tractography, cortico-cortical proximity, and microstructural similarity to construct a multiscale brain structural connectome. By employing the gradient mapping method, the gradient space derived from the multiscale structural connectome effectively recapitulated the sensory-association axis and anterior-posterior axis. Our findings revealed a continuous expansion of the multiscale structural gradient space during development, with the principal gradient increasingly distinguishing between primary and transmodal regions. This age-related differentiation coincided with regionally heterogeneous changes in cortical morphology. Furthermore, our study revealed that developmental changes in coupling between multiscale structural and functional connectivity were correlated with functional specialization refinement, as evidenced by changes in the participation coefficient. We also found that the differentiation of the principal multiscale structural gradient was associated with improved cognitive abilities, such as enhanced working memory and attention performance, and potentially supported by molecular processes related to synaptic functions. These findings advance our understanding of the intricate maturation process of brain structural organization and its implications for cognitive performance.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuroimaging contrast across the cortical hierarchy is the feature maximally linked to behavior and demographics 97%
- Mapping the Human Visual Thalamus and its Cytoarchitectonic Subdivisions Using Quantitative MRI 96%
- State and trait characteristics of anterior insula time-varying functional connectivity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The functional foundations of episodic memory remain stable throughout the lifespan 96%
- Direct interhemispheric cortical communication via thalamic commissures: a new white-matter pathway in the primate brain 95%
- Reversible fronto-occipitotemporal signaling complements task encoding and switching under ambiguous cues 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chemogenetic Stimulation of Tonic Locus Coeruleus Activity Strengthens the Default Mode Network 95%
- Brain connectivity-based prediction of real-life creativity is mediated by semantic memory structure 95%
- Sexually divergent development of depression-related brain networks during healthy human adolescence 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Shifting gradients of macroscale cortical organization mark the transition from childhood to adolescence 98%
- Connectional axis of individual functional variability: Patterns, structural correlates, and relevance for development and cognition 98%
- Development of structure-function coupling in human brain networks during youth 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.