Back

Transcriptomic comparison of in vitro models of the human placenta

Lapehn, S.; Nair, S.; Firsick, E. J.; MacDonald, J.; Thoreson, C.; Litch, J. A.; Bush, N. R.; Kadam, L.; Girard, S.; Myatt, L.; Prasad, B.; Sathyanarayana, S.; Paquette, A. G.

2024-06-16 developmental biology
10.1101/2024.06.14.598695 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Studying the human placenta through in vitro cell culture methods is necessary due to limited access and amenability of human placental tissue to certain experimental methods as well as distinct anatomical and physiological differences between animal and human placentas. Selecting an in vitro culture model of the human placenta is challenging due to representation of different trophoblast cell types with distinct biological roles and limited comparative studies that define key characteristics of these models. Therefore, the aim of this research was to create a comprehensive transcriptomic comparison of common in vitro models of the human placenta compared to bulk placental tissue from the CANDLE and GAPPS cohorts (N=1083). We performed differential gene expression analysis on publicly available RNA sequencing data from 6 common in vitro models of the human placenta (HTR-8/SVneo, BeWo, JEG-3, JAR, Primary Trophoblasts, and Villous Explants) and compared to CANDLE and GAPPS bulk placental tissue or cytotrophoblast, syncytiotrophoblast, and extravillous trophoblast cell types derived from bulk placental tissue. All in vitro placental models had a substantial number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, FDR<0.01) compared to the CANDLE and GAPPS placentas (Average DEGs=10,873), and the individual trophoblast cell types (Average DEGs=5,346), indicating that there are vast differences in gene expression compared to bulk and cell-type specific human placental tissue. Hierarchical clustering identified 53 gene clusters with distinct expression profiles across placental models, with 22 clusters enriched for specific KEGG pathways, 7 clusters enriched for high-expression placental genes, and 7 clusters enriched for absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion genes. In vitro placental models were classified by fetal sex based on expression of Y-chromosome genes that identified HTR-8/SVneo cells as being of female origin, while JEG-3, JAR, and BeWo cells are of male origin. Overall, none of the models were a close approximation of the transcriptome of bulk human placental tissue, highlighting the challenges with model selection. To enable researchers to select appropriate models, we have compiled data on differential gene expression, clustering, and fetal sex into an accessible web application: "Comparative Transcriptomic Placental Model Atlas (CTPMA)" which can be utilized by researchers to make informed decisions about their selection of in vitro placental models.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
3
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
4
Biology of Reproduction
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
9
Reproduction
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
10
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
Molecular Human Reproduction
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
12
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Clinical & Translational Immunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Differentiation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%