Spatially structured competition and cooperation alters algal carbon flow to bacteria
Kim, H.; Brisson, V.; Casey, J. R.; Swink, C.; Rolison, K. A.; Golini, A. N.; Northen, T. R.; Weber, P. K.; Velickovic, D.; Buie, C. R.; Mayali, X.; Stuart, R.
Show abstract
Microbial communities regulate the transformations of carbon in aquatic systems through metabolic interactions and food-web dynamics that can alter the balance of photosynthesis and respiration. Direct competition for resources is thought to drive microbial community assembly in algal systems, but other interaction modes that may shape communities are more challenging to isolate. Through untargeted metabolomics and metabolic modeling, we predicted the degree of resource competition between bacterial pairs when growing on model diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum-derived substrates. In a subsequent sequential media experiment, we found that pairwise interactions were consistently more cooperative than predicted based on resource competition alone, indicating an unexpected role for cooperation in algal carbon processing. To link this directly to algal carbon fate, we chose a representative cooperative and competitive influencer isolate and a model recipient and applied single-cell isotope tracing in a custom porous microplate cultivation system. In the presence of live algae, the recipient drew down more algal carbon in the presence of the cooperative influencer compared to the competitive influencer, supporting the sequential experiment results. We also found that total carbon assimilation into bacterial biomass, integrated over influencer and recipient, was significantly higher for the cooperative interaction. Our findings support the notion that non-competitive interactions are critical for predicting algal carbon fate. Significance StatementMicrobial interactions have widely been studied in the context of host resources but testing and measuring direct interactions in a lab has been particularly challenging. By combining untargeted metabolomics, sequential/(co-)culture, and metabolic modeling, we demonstrate that the presence of an unexpected interaction mode in a live system and show how it impacts the flow of host-derived resources. This top-down approach can help identify novel bacterial interactions that play a crucial role in microbial community-host ecosystems, which may have an impact in holobiont phenotypes including alga, fungal, or plant systems.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the interaction network of a synthetic gut bacterial community 97%
- Emergence and disruption of cooperativity in a denitrifying microbial community 95%
- Changes in interactions over ecological time scales influence single cell growth dynamics in a metabolically coupled marine microbial community 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Selective enrichment of high-affinity clade II N2O-reducers in a mixed culture 95%
- Correlative SIP-FISH-Raman-SEM-NanoSIMS links identity, morphology, biochemistry, and physiology of environmental microbes 95%
- Meta-omics reveals role of photosynthesis in Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation at a CO2-rich Geyser 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diatom Modulation of Microbial Consortia Through Use of Two Unique Secondary Metabolites 97%
- Chitin utilization by marine picocyanobacteria and the evolution of a planktonic lifestyle 96%
- Interspecies interactions determine growth dynamics of biopolymer degrading populations in microbial communities. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prochlorococcus rely on microbial interactions rather than on chlorotic resting stages to survive long-term nutrient starvation 96%
- DNA and RNA-SIP reveal Nitrospira spp. as key drivers of nitrification in groundwater-fed biofilters 96%
- Syntrophy via interspecies H2 transfer between Christensenella and Methanobrevibacter underlies their global co-occurrence in the human gut 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.