Neuromodulation with Ultrasound: Hypotheses on the Directionality of Effects and a Community Resource
Caffaratti, H.; Slater, B.; Shaheen, N.; Rhone, A.; Calmus, R.; Kritikos, M.; Kumar, S.; Dlouhy, B.; Oya, H.; Griffiths, T.; Boes, A. D.; Trapp, N.; Kaiser, M.; Sallet, J.; Banks, M. I.; Howard, M. A.; Zanaty, M.; Petkov, C. I.
Show abstract
Low-intensity Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation is a promising non-invasive technique for brain stimulation and focal neuromodulation. Research with humans and animal models has raised the possibility that TUS can be biased towards enhancing or suppressing neural function. Here, we first collate a set of hypotheses on the directionality of TUS effects and conduct an initial meta-analysis on available healthy human participant TUS studies reporting stimulation parameters and outcomes (n = 47 studies, 52 experiments). In initial exploratory analyses with univariate tests, we find that parameters such as the intensity and continuity of stimulation (duty cycle) show statistical trends towards likely TUS neural enhancement or suppression of function. Machine-learning analyses were limited by the currently small sample size. Given that human TUS sample sizes are expected to increase, predictability on the directionality of TUS effects could improve if a database is available. Therefore, we establish an inTUS database and resource for the systematic reporting of TUS parameters and outcomes to assist in greater precision in TUS use for brain stimulation and neuromodulation. The paper concludes with a selective review of human clinical TUS studies illustrating how hypotheses on the directionality of TUS effects could be developed for empirical testing in the intended clinical application, not limited to the examples provided. HighlightsO_LICollated set of hypotheses on using TUS to bias towards neural enhancement or suppression C_LIO_LIMeta-analysis results identify parameters that may bias directionality of TUS effects C_LIO_LIinTUS resource established for systematic reporting of TUS parameters and outcomes C_LIO_LISelective review of patient TUS studies for enhancing or suppressing neural function C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transferability of cathodal tDCS effects from the primary motor to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a multimodal TMS-EEG study 96%
- Targeted and optimized multi-channel transcranial direct current stimulation for focal epilepsy: An N-of-1 trial 94%
- The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-retest reliability of intrahemispheric dorsal premotor and primary motor cortex dual-site TMS connectivity measures 95%
- Electrode positioning errors reduce current dose for focal tDCS set-ups: Evidence from individualized electric field mapping 94%
- Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying regions in prefrontal cortex related to working memory improvement: a novel meta-analytic method using electric field modeling 95%
- The central autonomic system revisited - convergent evidence for a regulatory role of the insular and midcingulate cortex from neuroimaging meta-analyses 92%
- Differences in fMRI-based functional connectivity during abstinence or interventions between heroin-dependent individuals and healthy controls 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.