Ultra-High Dose Rate Helium Ion Beams: First In Vivo Evidence for Neuroprotective FLASH Effect
Dokic, I.; Tessonnier, T.; Meister, S.; Moustafa, M.; Ciamarone, F.; Krunic, D.; Haberer, T.; Debus, J.; Mairani, A.; Abdollahi, A.
Show abstract
Ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy with electrons and protons has shown potential for cancer treatment by effectively targeting tumors while sparing healthy tissues (FLASH effect). This study aimed to investigate the potential FLASH sparing effect of ultra-high-dose rate helium ion irradiation, focusing on acute brain injury and subcutaneous tumor response in a preclinical in vivo setting. Raster-scanned helium ion beams were used to compare the effects of standard dose rate (SDR at 0.2 Gy/s) and FLASH (at 141 Gy/s) radiotherapy on healthy brain tissue. Irradiation-induced brain injury was studied in C57BL/6 mice via DNA damage response, using nuclear {gamma}H2AX as a marker for double-strand breaks (DSB). The integrity of neurovascular and immune compartments was assessed through CD31+ microvascular density and activation of microglia/macrophages. Iba1+ ramified and CD68+ phagocytic microglia/macrophages were quantified, along with the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthetase (iNOS). Tumor response to SDR (0.2 Gy/s) and FLASH (250 Gy/s) radiotherapy was evaluated in A549 carcinoma model, using tumor volume and Kaplan-Meier survival as endpoints. The results showed that helium FLASH radiotherapy significantly reduced acute brain tissue injury compared to SDR, evidenced by lower levels of DSB and preserved neurovascular endothelium. Additionally, FLASH radiotherapy reduced neuroinflammatory signals compared to SDR, as indicated by fewer CD68+ iNOS+ microglia/macrophages. FLASH radiotherapy achieved tumor control comparable to that of SDR radiotherapy. This study is the first to report the FLASH sparing effect of raster scanning helium ion radiotherapy in vivo, highlighting its potential for neuroprotection and effective tumor control.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams 97%
- A multi-institutional study to investigate the sparing effect after whole brain electron FLASH in mice: Reproducibility and temporal evolution of functional, electrophysiological, and neurogenic endpoints 97%
- First demonstration of the FLASH effect with ultrahigh dose-rate high-energy X-rays 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide transcriptomic response of whole blood to radiation 96%
- Fast dose fractionation using ultra-short laser accelerated proton pulses can increase cancer cell mortality, which relies on functional PARP1 protein 96%
- Modulating the unfolded protein response: Impacts of radiation on the response of prostate cancer cells to ONC201 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive factors for the development of peritumoral brain edema after LINAC-based radiation treatment in patients with intracranial meningioma 96%
- Analyses of cancer incidence and other morbidities in gamma irradiated B6CF1 mice 95%
- Sensitivity of radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeters to accumulated doses 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract 97%
- Discordance in acute gastrointestinal toxicity between synchrotron-based proton and linac-based electron ultra-high dose rate irradiation 97%
- FLASH Bragg-peak irradiation with a therapeutic carbon ion beam: first in vivo results 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of head-only exposure to 900 MHz GSM electromagnetic fields in rats : changes in neuronal activity as revealed by c-Fos imaging without concomitant cognitive impairments 90%
- Comparison of Oxidative and Hypoxic Stress Responsive Genes from Meta-Analysis of Public Transcriptomes 86%
- Breathome discriminate Ischemic Heart Disease 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.