Back

Intra-genomic genes-to-genes correlation enables genome representation

Chen, J.; Ma, X.; He, J.; Wang, Y.; Ren, Y.; Qi, L.; Song, L.; Ruan, L.; Fan, C.; Huang, T.; Cheng, J.; Liu, X.; Chen, F.; Huang, Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Pu, Y.; Zhao, N.; Guo, C.

2025-09-21 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.06.12.598634 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The bacterial pan-genome consists of core genes shared by all members of a taxonomy and accessory genes found in only a subset. The correlation among genes within the pan-genome could advance our understanding of evolution and tackle medical challenges. Here, we discovered a strong intra-genomic correlation among bacterial pan-genes within each of Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Campylobacter jejuni. With a convolutional neural network assisted core genome knock-out simulation, we found that different combinations of fewer than 20 highly variable core genes could recover the sub-species type classified by complete core genome with accuracy >95%. This observation led us to test the genes-to-genes predictability: with more than 52,000 assemblies from each species, combinations of highly variable core genes could predict the sequence variants of other core genes (average accuracy >94%) within the same genome and could also predict sequence variants (average accuracy >91%) as well as the presence (average AUROC >0.91) of some accessory genes. Furthermore, combinations of highly variable core genes could also predict multiple antibiotic resistances (AUROC >0.80) in large published datasets of E. coli, S. aureus, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Collectively, we propose that genes within the same genome can strongly correlate with each other. Therefore, the strain phylogeny and the status of other genes could be uniformly represented by combinations of highly variable core genes, which could further represent certain phenotypes including in vitro resistance.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.