Population size estimation when multiple samples carrying the risk of misidentification are taken simultaneously from the same individual
Fraysse, R.; Choquet, R.; Pradel, R.
Show abstract
Although non-invasive sampling is increasingly used in capture-recapture (CR) monitoring, it carries a risk of misidentification that, if ignored, causes an overestimation of population size. Models that deal with misidentification have been proposed. However, these models assume that only one sample can be collected per individual at one occasion. This is not true for several monitoring programs based on DNA, for example for those that extract the DNA from faecal samples. The models do not take repeated observations into account, leading to biased estimates. In this paper, we develop an approach that extends the latent multinomial model (LMM) of Link et al., 2010 using a Poisson distribution to model the number of samplings of the same individual on a given occasion. We then conduct simulations to test how our new model performs. As an illustration, we applied the new Poisson model to a collection of Eurasian otter faeces (Lampa et al., 2015). Our model yields unbiased estimates of population size when the expected number of samples per individual ({lambda}) is sufficiently high: simulations with{lambda} [≥] 0.36 and five capture occasions or with{lambda} [≥] 0.23 and seven or more occasions. In contrast, when{lambda} = 0.11 (corresponding to about 42%, 53% and 62% of the individuals being detected with respectively 5, 7 and 9 occasions), the population size is consistently underestimated. Applying the model to the otter dataset confirms the presence of misidentifications, consistent with the authors expectations. Our findings indicate that repeated observations can be modelled without bias. The application on otters shows that our model is necessary to accurately estimate population size in presence of misidentification and repeated observations.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 96%
- Integrated Movement Models for Individual Tracking and Species Distribution Data 96%
- Robust Bayesian analysis of animal networks subject to biases in sampling intensity and censoring 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using informative priors to account for identifiability issues in occupancy models with identification errors 96%
- Accounting for observation biases associated with counts of young when estimating fecundity: case study on the arboreal-nesting red kite (Milvus milvus) 95%
- Mark loss can strongly bias demographic rates in multi-state models: a case study with simulated and empirical datasets 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Using known births to account for delayed marking in population estimation of North Atlantic right whales 95%
- A machine learning method for estimating the probability of presence using presence-background data 95%
- Modeling the demography of species providing extended parental care: A capture-recapture multievent model with a case study on Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating contemporary migration numbers of adults based on kinship relationships in iteroparous species 96%
- Inferring the timing and strength of natural selection and gene migration in the evolution of chicken from ancient DNA data 95%
- Simulation-based spatially explicit close-kin mark-recapture 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.