Back

Machine learning and the labour market: A portrait of occupational and worker inequities in Canada

Jetha, A.; Liao, Q.; Vahid Shahidi, F.; Vu, V.; Biswas, A.; Smith, B.; Smith, P.

2024-06-13 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2024.06.12.24308855 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionMachine learning (ML) is increasingly used by Canadian workplaces. Concerningly, the impact of ML may be inequitable and disrupt social determinants of health. The aim of this study is to estimate the number of workers in occupations highly exposed to ML and describe differences in ML exposure represents according to occupational and worker sociodemographic factors. MethodsCanadian occupations were scored according to the extent to which they were made up of job tasks that could be performed by ML. Eight years of data from Canadas Labour Force Survey were pooled and the number of Canadians in occupations with high or low exposed to machine learning were estimated. The relationship between gender, hourly wages, educational attainment and occupational job skills, experience and training requirements and ML exposure was examined using stratified logistic regression models. ResultsApproximately, 1.9 million Canadians are working in occupations with high ML exposure and 744,250 workers were employed in occupations with low ML exposure. Women were more likely to be employed in occupations with high ML exposure than men. Workers with greater educational attainment and in occupations with higher wages and greater job skills requirements were more likely to experience high ML exposure. Women, especially those with less educational attainment and in jobs with greater job skills, training and experience requirements, were disproportionately exposed to ML. ConclusionML has the potential to widen inequities in the working population. Disadvantaged segments of the workforce may be most likely to be employed in occupations with high ML exposure. ML may have a gendered effect and disproportionately impact certain groups of women when compared to men. We provide a critical evidence base to develop strategic responses that ensure inclusion in a working world where ML is commonplace. KEY MESSAGESO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSO_LIThe Canadian labour market is undergoing an artificial intelligence (AI) revolution that has the potential to have widespread impact on a range of occupations and worker groups. C_LIO_LIIt is unclear how which the adoption of machine learning (ML), an AI subfield, within the working world might contribute to inequities within the labour market. C_LI What this study addsO_LISegments of the workforce which have been previously disadvantaged may be most likely to work in occupations most likely to be affected by ML. C_LIO_LIML may have a gendered effect and disproportionately impact some groups of women when compared to men. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyFindings can inform targeted policies and programs that optimize the economic benefits of ML while addressing disparities that can emerge because of the adoption of the technology on workers.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.