Membrane affinity difference between MinD monomer and dimer is not crucial for MinD gradient formation in Bacillus subtilis
Bohorquez, L.; Strahl, H.; Marenduzzo, D.; Thiele, M.; Burmann, F.; Hamoen, L. W.
Show abstract
Proteins can diffuse micrometers in seconds, yet bacterial cells are able to maintain stable protein gradients. The best studied bacterial protein gradient is the Min system of Escherichia coli. In rod-shaped bacteria the MinCD proteins prevent formation of minicells by inhibiting FtsZ polymerization close to the cell poles. In E. coli these proteins oscillate between cell poles within a minute, resulting in an increased MinCD concentration at the poles. This oscillation is caused by the interaction between MinD and the protein MinE, which form an ATP-driven reaction-diffusion system, whereby the ATPase MinD cycles between a monomeric cytosolic and a dimeric membrane attached states. Bacillus subtilis also has MinCD, but lacks MinE. In this case MinCD form a static gradient that requires the transmembrane protein MinJ, located at cell poles and cell division sites. A recent reaction-diffusion model was successful in recreating the MinD gradient in B. subtilis, assuming that MinD cycles between cytosol and membrane, like in E. coli. Here we show that the monomeric and dimeric states of B. subtilis MinD have comparable membrane affinities, that MinD interacts with MinJ as a dimer, and that MinJ is not required for membrane localization of MinD. Based on these new findings we tested different models, using kinetic Monte Carlo simulations, and found that a difference in diffusion rate between the monomer and dimer, rather than a difference in membrane affinity, is important for B. subtilis MinCD gradient formation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MmpL3, Wag31 and PlrA are involved in coordinating polar growth with peptidoglycan metabolism and nutrient availability 96%
- Comparative study of bacterial SPOR domains identifies functionally important differences in glycan binding affinity 95%
- The Cell Division Protein FzlA Performs a Conserved Function in Diverse Alphaproteobacteria 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bacterial chemotaxis to saccharides is governed by a trade-off between sensing and uptake 95%
- Deconstructing glucose-mediated catabolite repression of the lac operon of Escherichia coli: II. Positive feedback exists and drives the repression 95%
- Switching an active site helix in dihydrofolate reductase reveals limits to sub-domain modularity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.