Optimizing Segmentation In Occupancy Modelling Of Camera-Trap Data
de Jager, M.; van Kuijk, M.; Zwerts, J. A.; Jansen, P. A.
Show abstract
O_LIAccurate estimation of species abundances is a common challenge in conservation biology, particularly when abundances are compared in space or time. Occupancy modelling provides relative abundance estimates from camera-trapping data without the need for individual recognition. This requires segmentation of continuous records into a series of intervals with either detection or non-detection. While the segmentation method may have profound effects on the accuracy of occupancy modelling, no form of segmentation optimization is yet available. C_LIO_LIWe assessed how segmentation, defined by interval length and number, influences the accuracy of predictions by the Royle-Nichols occupancy model and how this relationship depends on species density, study duration, and the number of sampling points. We simulated capture data using an individual-based model in which we varied the species densities between study locations, and then fitted models using different segmentations. Using the simulation results, we developed a simple tool for choosing optimal segmentation and the best minimum number of intervals to use. To provide an example, we used the optimization tool on actual data from a camera-trapping study in Western Equatorial Africa and compared relative wildlife abundances between two forest management types. C_LIO_LIWe found that the optimum interval length for the Royle-Nichols occupancy model varied with species density, study duration, and the number of sampling points. By analyzing the empirical data, we found that optimal segmentation and minimum number of intervals differed substantially between species. Modelling with optimized, species-specific interval numbers and lengths yielded more conservative outcomes (i.e. fewer significant effects) than did modelling with fixed numbers and lengths. Furthermore, the choice of interval length can affect the direction of relationships. C_LIO_LIOur results indicate that the interval length is by no means a parameter to be standardized at a given value but should be carefully chosen based on the properties of the data at hand. This study shows that the arbitrary segmentation that is commonly used in occupancy modelling may not be optimal. Our tool helps to optimize segmentation, increases the accuracy of relative abundance estimations, and thus facilitates the use of camera-trapping studies to evaluate conservation measures. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mt or not Mt: Temporal variation in detection probability in spatial capture-recapture and occupancy models 96%
- Accounting for observation biases associated with counts of young when estimating fecundity: case study on the arboreal-nesting red kite (Milvus milvus) 95%
- Bird population trend analyses for a monitoring scheme with a highly structured sampling design 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards an automated protocol for wildlife density estimation using camera-traps 97%
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 96%
- Effectiveness of Joint Species Distribution Models in the Presence of Imperfect Detection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability 96%
- An efficient method of evaluating multiple concurrent management actions on invasive populations 96%
- Fitting individual-based models of spatial population dynamics to long-term monitoring data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- How citizen science could improve Species Distribution Models and their independent assessment 94%
- Failure to meet the exchangeability assumption in Bayesian multispecies occupancy models: Implications for study design 94%
- Too few, too many, or just right? Optimizing sample sizes for population-level inferences in animal tracking projects 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical guidelines to increase the value of citizen science data: using eBird data to estimate species occurrence 96%
- Modelling the distribution of rare invertebrates by correcting class imbalance and spatial bias 95%
- Identifying conservation priorities in a defaunated tropical biodiversity hotspot 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.