Back

Intra-organ cell specific mitochondrial quantitative interactomics

Bakhtina, A. A.; Campbell, M. D.; Sibley, B. D.; Sanchez-Contreras, M.; Sweetwyne, M. T.; Bruce, J. E.

2024-06-12 systems biology
10.1101/2024.06.10.598354 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Almost every organ consists of many cell types, each with its unique functions. Proteomes of these cell types are thus unique too. But it is reasonable to assume that interactome (inter and intra molecular interactions of proteins) are also distinct since protein interactions are what ultimately carry out the function. Podocytes and tubules are two cell types within kidney with vastly different functions: podocytes envelop the blood vessels in the glomerulus and act as filters while tubules are located downstream of the glomerulus and are responsible for reabsorption of important nutrients. It has been long known that for tubules mitochondria plays an important role as they require a lot of energy to carry out their functions. In podocytes, however, it has been assumed that mitochondria might not matter as much in both normal physiology and pathology1. Here we have applied quantitative cross-linking mass spectrometry to compare mitochondrial interactomes of tubules and podocytes using a transgenic mitochondrial tagging strategy to immunoprecipitate cell-specific mitochondria directly from whole kidney. We have uncovered that mitochondrial proteomes of these cell types are quite similar, although still showing unique features that correspond to known functions, such as high energy production through TCA cycle in tubules and requirements for detoxification in podocytes which are on the frontline of filtration where they encounter toxic compounds and therefore, as a non-renewing cell type they must have ways to protect themselves from cellular toxicity. But we gained much deeper insight with the interactomics data. We were able to find pathways differentially regulated in podocytes and tubules based on changing cross-link levels and not just protein levels. Among these pathways are betaine metabolism, lysine degradation, and many others. We have also demonstrated how quantitative interactomics could be used to detect different activity levels of an enzyme even when protein abundances of it are the same between cell types. We have validated this finding with an orthogonal activity assay. Overall, this work presents a new view of mitochondrial biology for two important, but functionally distinct, cell types within the mouse kidney showing both similarities and unique features. This data can continue to be explored to find new aspects of mitochondrial biology, especially in podocytes, where mitochondria has been understudied. In the future this methodology can also be applied to other organs to uncover differences in the function of cell types.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
3
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Molecular Omics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
6
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
10
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
17
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
22
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
26
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
28
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%