Immune Checkpoint Blockade Delays Cancer and Extends Survival in Murine DNA Polymerase Mutator Syndromes
Sawant, A.; Shi, F.; Lopes, E. C.; Hu, Z.; Abdelfattah, S.; Baul, J.; Powers, J.; Hinrichs, C.; Rabinowitz, J.; Chan, C.; Lattime, E.; Ganesan, S.; White, E.
Show abstract
Mutations in polymerases Pold1 and Pole exonuclease domains in humans are associated with increased cancer incidence, elevated tumor mutation burden (TMB) and response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Although ICB is approved for treatment of several cancers, not all tumors with elevated TMB respond. Here we generated Pold1 and Pole proofreading mutator mice and show that ICB treatment of mice with high TMB tumors did not improve survival as only a subset of tumors responded. Similarly, introducing the mutator alleles into mice with Kras/p53 lung cancer did not improve survival, however, passaging mutator tumor cells in vitro without immune editing caused rejection in immune-competent hosts, demonstrating the efficiency by which cells with antigenic mutations are eliminated. Finally, ICB treatment of mutator mice earlier, before observable tumors delayed cancer onset, improved survival, and selected for tumors without aneuploidy, suggesting the use of ICB in individuals at high risk for cancer prevention. HighlightsO_LIGermline somatic and conditional Pold1 and Pole exonuclease domain mutations in mice produce a mutator phenotype. C_LIO_LISpontaneous cancers arise in mutator mice that have genomic features comparable to human tumors with these mutations. C_LIO_LIICB treatment of mutator mice with tumors did not improve survival as only a subset of tumors respond. C_LIO_LIIntroduction of the mutator alleles into an autochthonous mouse lung cancer model also did not produce immunogenic tumors, whereas passaging mutator tumor cells in vitro caused immune rejection indicating efficient selection against antigenic mutations in vivo. C_LIO_LIProphylactic ICB treatment delayed cancer onset, improved survival, and selected for tumors with no aneuploidy. C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=116 SRC="FIGDIR/small/597960v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6cd159org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@243fd1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d9da6borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@192be51_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Genomically and Clinically Annotated Patient Derived Xenograft (PDX) Resource for Preclinical Research in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 94%
- Acquired RAD51C promoter methylation loss causes PARP inhibitor resistance in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma 94%
- Kinome focused CRISPR-Cas9 screens in African ancestry patient-derived breast cancer organoids identifies essential kinases and synergy of EGFR and FGFR1 inhibition. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multidimensional Characterization of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas with FUS-TFCP2 or EWSR1-TFCP2 Fusions 94%
- Chronic circadian disruption modulates breast cancer cell stemness and their immune microenvironment to drive metastasis in mice 94%
- Loss of Rnf31 and Vps4b sensitizes pancreatic cancer to T cell-mediated killing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Retroelement co-option disrupts the cancer transcriptional programme 95%
- Genomic analysis of patient-derived xenograft models reveals intra-tumor heterogeneity in endometrial cancer and can predict tumor growth inhibition with talazoparib 94%
- Novel temporal and spatial patterns of metastatic colonization from rapid-autopsy tumor biopsies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Promoterless Transposon Mutagenesis Drives Solid Cancers via Tumor Suppressor Inactivation 94%
- Unraveling the heterogeneous mutational signature of spontaneously developing tumors in MLH1-/- mice 94%
- Intertumoral Genetic Heterogeneity Generates Distinct Tumor Microenvironments in a Novel Murine Synchronous Melanoma Model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.