Back

Myocardial infarction creates a critical time window for AAV gene therapy

Chen, G.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yang, L.; Gao, F.; Dong, E.; Guo, Y.

2024-06-11 physiology
10.1101/2024.06.10.597311 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a major gene delivery vector for cardiac gene therapy. The factors that influence AAV-based cardiac gene transfer remain incompletely understood. This study showed that myocardial infarction (MI) enhanced cardiac AAV transduction and gene expression in mice after systemic administration, peaking at the third day post MI. These additional AAV vectors enriched at the infarcted region, correlated with the pathological permeabilization of the coronary vessels. The outcome of AAV-base gene therapy for MI, via Camk2d base editing, was significantly improved when AAV was injected at the third day post MI. Together, our findings uncovered a critical therapeutic time window after MI that facilitated AAV-based cardiac gene transfer, which could be harnessed to boost both basic and translational cardiology. MethodsAdult C57BL/6 mice were subjected to left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery ligation. Permanent LAD ligation created the MI model while 30min ligation followed by reperfusion established the ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) model. 2x1011 AAV vectors were injected into the mice via tail vein. The AAV vectors carried transgenes that were activated by the cardiomyocyte-specific Tnnt2 promoter or the constitutively active CMV promoter. AAV expressed luciferase with the hemagglutinin (HA) tag. The amount of AAV vectors were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of genomic DNA. Transgene expression was measured by RT-qPCR at the mRNA level or HA tag immunofluorescence imaging and western blot at the protein level. Luciferase activity was measured via bioluminescence imaging.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.