Back

B-BIND: Biophysical Bayesian Inference forNeurodegenerative Dynamics

Agrawal, A.; Rachleff, V. M.; Travaglini, K. J.; Mukherjee, S.; Crane, P. K.; Hawrylycz, M.; Keene, C. D.; Lein, E.; Mena, G. E.; Gabitto, M. I.

2024-07-31 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.06.10.597236 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Throughout an organisms life, a multitude of complex and interdependent biological systems transition through biophysical processes that serve as indicators of the underlying biological states. Inferring these latent, unobserved states is a goal of modern biology and neuroscience. However, in many experimental setups, we can at best obtain discrete snapshots of the system at different times and for different individuals. This challenge is particularly relevant in the study of Alzheimers Disease (AD) progression, where we observe the aggregation of pathology in brain donors, but the underlying disease state is unknown. This paper proposes a biophysically motivated Bayesian framework (B-BIND: Biophysical Bayesian Inference for Neurode-generative Dynamics), where the disease state is modeled and continuously inferred from observed quantifications of multiple AD pathological proteins. Inspired by biophysical models, we describe pathological burden as an exponential process. The progression of AD is modeled by assigning a latent score, termed pseudotime, to each pathological state, creating a pseudotemporal order of donors based on their pathological burden. We study the theoretical properties of the model using linearization to reveal convergence and identifiability properties. We provide Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation algorithms, illustrating the effectiveness of our approach with multiple simulation studies across various data conditions. Applying this methodology to data from the Seattle Alzheimers Disease Brain Cell Atlas, we infer the pseudotime ordering of donors. Finally, we analyze the information within each pathological feature to refine the model, focusing on the most informative pathologies. This framework lays the groundwork for continuous pseudotime modeling in the analysis of neurodegenerative diseases.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.