B-BIND: Biophysical Bayesian Inference forNeurodegenerative Dynamics
Agrawal, A.; Rachleff, V. M.; Travaglini, K. J.; Mukherjee, S.; Crane, P. K.; Hawrylycz, M.; Keene, C. D.; Lein, E.; Mena, G. E.; Gabitto, M. I.
Show abstract
Throughout an organisms life, a multitude of complex and interdependent biological systems transition through biophysical processes that serve as indicators of the underlying biological states. Inferring these latent, unobserved states is a goal of modern biology and neuroscience. However, in many experimental setups, we can at best obtain discrete snapshots of the system at different times and for different individuals. This challenge is particularly relevant in the study of Alzheimers Disease (AD) progression, where we observe the aggregation of pathology in brain donors, but the underlying disease state is unknown. This paper proposes a biophysically motivated Bayesian framework (B-BIND: Biophysical Bayesian Inference for Neurode-generative Dynamics), where the disease state is modeled and continuously inferred from observed quantifications of multiple AD pathological proteins. Inspired by biophysical models, we describe pathological burden as an exponential process. The progression of AD is modeled by assigning a latent score, termed pseudotime, to each pathological state, creating a pseudotemporal order of donors based on their pathological burden. We study the theoretical properties of the model using linearization to reveal convergence and identifiability properties. We provide Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation algorithms, illustrating the effectiveness of our approach with multiple simulation studies across various data conditions. Applying this methodology to data from the Seattle Alzheimers Disease Brain Cell Atlas, we infer the pseudotime ordering of donors. Finally, we analyze the information within each pathological feature to refine the model, focusing on the most informative pathologies. This framework lays the groundwork for continuous pseudotime modeling in the analysis of neurodegenerative diseases.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Parsimonious EBM: generalising the event-based model of disease progression for simultaneous events 96%
- Valid and powerful group statistics for decoding accuracy: Information Prevalence Inference using the i-th order statistic (i-test) 94%
- Brain kernel: a new spatial covariance function for fMRI data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tree-informed Bayesian multi-source domain adaptation: cross-population probabilistic cause-of-death assignment using verbal autopsy 95%
- A scalable approach for continuous time Markov models with covariates 94%
- Survival Analysis on Rare Events Using Group-Regularized Multi-Response Cox Regression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using normative models pre-trained on cross-sectional data to evaluate intra-individual longitudinal changes in neuroimaging data 96%
- Modelling the neural code in large populations of correlated neurons 95%
- Direct Extraction of Signal and Noise Correlations from Two-Photon Calcium Imaging of Ensemble Neuronal Activity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Bayesian Approach to Restricted Latent Class Models for Scientifically-Structured Clustering of Multivariate Binary Outcomes 95%
- A Regularized Bayesian Dirichlet-multinomial Regression Model for Integrating Single-cell-level Omics and Patient-level Clinical Study Data 93%
- Bayesian inference for copy number intra-tumoral heterogeneity from single-cell RNA-sequencing data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.