Back

Calibrated prediction of scarce adverse drug reaction labels with conditional neural processes

Garcia-Ortegon, M.; Seal, S.; Singh, S.; Bender, A.; Bacallado, S.

2024-06-10 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.06.07.598036 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major source of concern in the development of novel pharmaceuticals. ADRs may be identified in the late stages of development or even after commercialization, which may lead to failure or discontinuation after spending enormous resources on candidate molecules. Thus, predicting ADRs early in the process could help reduce costs by avoiding future failures. However, due to the low number of drugs approved, the amount of historical datapoints on ADRs is limited, which makes their prediction challenging for traditional chemoinformatics methods. Interestingly, each approved drug may have been annotated for hundreds of ADRs, which opens the door to framing ADR prediction as a multi-task or meta-learning problem. In this work, we adopt a meta-learning approach to ADR prediction by applying conditional neural processes (CNPs) to the publicly available Side Effect Resource (SIDER). Our results suggest that CNPs are competitive against single-task baselines even when trained on sparse datasets with missing labels. Furthermore, we find that their predictions are well-calibrated. Finally, we evaluate their performance on ADRs associated to different physiological systems and confirm good predictions across organ classes. Our findings suggest that meta-learning strategies may be beneficial for data-limited clinical endpoints like ADRs.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.