Spatial self-organization of cancer stem cell niches revealed by live single-cell imaging
Brule, M.; Horochowska, A.; Fontaine, E.; Torero-Ibad, R.; Woesteland, F.; Denoulet, M.; Pesez, J.; Adriaenssens, E.; Toillon, R.-A.; Le-Bourhis, X.; Pfeuty, B.; Lagadec, C.; Anquez, F.
Show abstract
Phenotypic plasticity is a major factor of tumor heterogeneity and treatment resistance. In particular, cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a small subpopulation within tumors with self-renewal and tumor-forming capabilities. Understanding reprogramming, maintenance, and lineage properties of CSCs requires dedicated tools to disentangle the respective influences of phenotypic inheritance and cell-cell interactions. Here we set up ultra-wide field microscopy of breast cancer cell lines expressing a stemness fluorescent reporter for several days. The fluorescent reporter distinguishes three phenotypes: cancer stem cells (CSCs), cancer differentiated cells (CDCs) and intermediate/transiting cancer cells (iCCs). Spatial statistics indicate significant zonation, aka phenotypic niches, with CSC clustering near each other but away from CDCs. Surprisingly, single cell time series reveal spontaneous reprogramming events from CDC to CSC even in unperturbed populations. We identify that such transitions are prone to arise during the cell cycle. Moreover, lineage analysis shows that the phenotype is partially inherited from ancestor cells. However, such heredity is not sufficient to explain the spatial properties of the cell population, which also depend on cell-cell interactions. Indeed, we identified that phenotypic transitions of cancer cells are influenced by the phenotypic state of neighboring cells. Reprogramming into CSCs is respectively promoted and inhibited by the presence of CSCs and CDCs in the neighborhood. Altogether, our results disentangle how phenotypic inheritance and intercellular interactions orchestrate the spatio-temporal self-organization of cancer cell heterogeneity, maintaining a subpopulation of CSCs within niches.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying chromosomal instability from intratumoral karyotype diversity using agent-based modeling and Bayesian inference 95%
- Different translation dynamics of β- and γ-actin regulates cell migration 95%
- Large-scale analysis and computer modeling reveal hidden regularities behind variability of cell division patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana embryogenesis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell-type specific mechanical response and myosin dynamics during retinal lens development in Drosophila 94%
- Tumor microtubes connect pancreatic cancer cells in an Arp2/3 complex-dependent manner 94%
- Performance of deep learning restoration methods for the extraction of particle dynamics in noisy microscopy image sequences 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.