Assessing the impact of testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow devices in NHS acute trusts in England
Chen, S.; Hounsell, R.; Cantrell, L.; Tsui, L. H.; Naidoo, R.; Daha, P.; Creswell, R.; Bajaj, S.; Flegg, J. A.; Fowler, T.; Hopkins, S.; Lambert, B.; Voysey, M.; White, L. J.; EY-Oxford Health Analytics Consortium, ; Stepniewska, K.; Shretta, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundTwice-weekly lateral flow device (LFD) testing was introduced for routine asymptomatic testing of healthcare workers (HCWs) in the National Health Service (NHS) in England in November 2020, with the primary aim of reducing nosocomial infections among staff and patients and a secondary aim of reducing absenteeism among HCWs. Here, we describe the burdens of HCW absenteeism and nosocomial infections in NHS acute trusts and the reported testing intensity of LFDs and associated costs from October 2020 to March 2022 and assess the impact of LFD testing on reducing these burdens. Methods and FindingsWe collected 16 million LFD testing results (total cost GBP 1.64 billion) reported in NHS acute trusts through Englands Pillar 1 and 2 testing programmes from 1 October 2020 to 30 March 2022. We estimated the prevalence of nosocomial COVID-19 infections in NHS acute trusts using data from the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC). Testing data were linked with nosocomial infections and full-time equivalent (FTE) days lost by trust for NHS acute trusts. We used a mixed-effects linear model to examine the association between FTE days lost and LFD test coverage. The relationship between weekly prevalence of nosocomial infections and LFD test coverage in the previous week was modelled using logistic regression weighted by the number of new COVID-19 cases reported in the ISARIC dataset for that week. We adjusted both models for community prevalence of COVID-19 infections, average income deprivation score, prevalence of variants of concern and LFD test positivity. FTE days lost among HCWs varied considerably by trust type, staff group, geographical location of trusts, and progress of the pandemic in England. Increased LFD test coverage was associated with decreases in FTE days lost due to COVID-19 from November 2020 to July 2021, with no association observed from August 2021 to March 2022. Higher community prevalence levels were associated with significant increases in FTE days lost due to COVID-19 in all periods except the pre-vaccination period (last two months of 2020). The model predicted that changes in testing levels (50-150%) would have resulted in modest changes in FTE days lost due to COVID-19 for all time periods. We identified 3,794 nosocomial infections (if patients developed COVID-19 symptoms 7 days or more after their hospital admission) among 106,377 hospitalised COVID-19 patients in 136 NHS acute trusts. The proportion of nosocomial infections among new weekly cases in hospitalised patients was negatively associated with reported LFD testing levels. The strength of the association varied over time and was estimated to be highest during the Omicron period, although no effect of testing on HCW absenteeism was found. The observed HCW testing/reporting was estimated to be associated with a 16.8% (95% confidence interval 8.2%, 18.8%) reduction in nosocomial infections compared with a hypothetical testing scenario at 25% of actual levels, translating to a cost saving per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of GBP 18,500-46,400. ConclusionsLFD testing was an impactful public health intervention for reducing HCW absenteeism and nosocomial infections in NHS acute trusts and was cost effective in preventing nosocomial infections. Author SummaryO_ST_ABSWhy was this study done?C_ST_ABSO_LIIn any pandemic response, mass diagnostic testing plays a key role. C_LIO_LIWe sought to evaluate the burdens of healthcare worker absenteeism and nosocomial infections in NHS acute trusts, the reported testing intensity using lateral flow devices (LFDs) and associated costs, and the impact of LFD testing on reducing these burdens. C_LI What did the researchers do and find?O_LIWe collected 16 million LFD testing results and full-time equivalent (FTE) days lost due to COVID-19, obtained from healthcare workers (HCWs) in NHS acute trusts in England between 1 October 2020 and 30 March 2022. C_LIO_LIWe estimated the number of nosocomial COVID-19 infections in NHS acute trusts using data from the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC). C_LIO_LITesting data were linked with nosocomial infections and FTE days lost due to COVID-19 by trust for NHS acute trusts. C_LIO_LIWe used a mixed-effects linear model to examine the association between FTE days lost due to COVID-19 and LFD test coverage and applied a logistic regression to assess the association between nosocomial infections and LFD test coverage. C_LIO_LIWe found that LFD testing in the healthcare setting was an impactful public health intervention. C_LIO_LILFD testing reduced HCW absenteeism and nosocomial infections in NHS acute trusts; it was also cost effective in preventing nosocomial infections. C_LI What do these findings mean?O_LIOur analysis of the available data indicated that testing HCWs had varying impacts (on both nosocomial infections and HCW FTE days lost due to COVID-19) throughout the pandemic, possibly influenced by external factors such as community prevalence and vaccination. C_LIO_LIIn any future pandemic, HCW testing interventions should incorporate collection of and/or timely access to relevant data, including HCW absenteeism, routine test results, community prevalence, and hospitalisation and mortality data. C_LIO_LIThe lessons learnt from this study could be used by relevant authorities to support the real-time assessment of any testing service and adjustment of the testing regimen; they could also be used to help develop more targeted and agile testing systems, which operationally would require the ability to turn mass testing off and on as an epidemic progressed. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying the impact of hospital catchment area definitions on hospital admissions forecasts: COVID-19 in England, September 2020 - April 2021 94%
- Comparative assessment of methods for short-term forecasts of COVID-19 admissions in England at the local level 92%
- A national retrospective cohort study of mechanical ventilator availability and its association with mortality risk in intensive care patients with COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare-associated COVID-19 in England: a national data linkage study 96%
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in healthcare workers and other staff at North Bristol NHS Trust: a sociodemographic analysis 93%
- Inconsistent directions of change in case severity across successive SARS-CoV-2 variant waves suggests an unpredictable future 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post-peak dynamics of a national Omicron SARS-CoV-2 epidemic during January 2022 93%
- Rapid antigen testing as a reactive public health response to surges in SARS-CoV-2 outbreak risk in healthcare settings 93%
- Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron and Delta hospitalisation: test negative case-control study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of whole area testing of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in Merthyr Tydfil, 2020: A Modelling and economic analysis 94%
- Access to personal protective equipment in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: results from a nationwide cohort study (UK-REACH) 92%
- Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- CoMix: Changes in social contacts as measured by the contact survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in England between March 2020 and March 2021 93%
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 92%
- Symptom reporting in over 1 million people: community detection of COVID-19 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.