Back

Effect of PCI on Clinical Prognosis of Chronic Coronary Artery Occlusion

Lei, J.; Mei, W.; PU, L.; Dong, L.; Wang, J.-p.; Meng, H.-y.; Kong, X.-Q.; Chen, L.-l.

2024-06-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.06.05.24308526 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCoronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are considered to increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether long-term clinical outcomes could be improved by successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over optimal medical therapy (OMT) in CTO patients. Methods258 consecutive patients with CTO lesions undergoing PCI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2011 to December 2017 were enrolled. After 25 were excluded due to CABG surgery, a total of 233 patients who met the enrollment criteria were divided into successful CTO-PCI group (n=187) and CTO-OMT group (n=46) based on the treatment received. The study primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and stroke. The secondary endpoint was all-cause death. ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 78 months, PCI treatment significantly improved MACCE incidence survival probability compared with OMT (29.55% vs 21.95% p=0.028). There was no difference between these two groups in secondary endpoint (p=0.93). There was also no significant difference in MACCE between single vessel CTO lesions and single vessel CTO combined with multiple vessel lesions(p=0.54). The cumulative survival of LAD is the highest among different branch lesion groups(p=0.044). Elderly patients ([≥]65 years) in PCI group showed a significant decrease of MACCE incidence compared with OMT (35.00% vs 21.33% p=0.001). ConclusionsSuccessful PCI in CTO patients is associated with a significant decrease of MACCE compared with OMT.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
2
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.3%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
5
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
8
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
21
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%