Back

Nocturnal synchronization between hippocampal ripples and cortical delta power is a biomarker of hippocampal epileptogenicity

Iwata, T.; Yanagisawa, T.; Fukuma, R.; Ikegaya, Y.; Oshino, S.; Tani, N.; Khoo, H. M.; Sugano, H.; Iimura, Y.; Suzuki, H.; Kishima, H.

2024-06-05 neurology
10.1101/2024.06.05.24308489 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveHippocampal ripples are biomarkers of epileptogenicity in patients with epilepsy, and physiological features characterize memory function in healthy individuals. Discriminating between pathological and physiological ripples is important for identifying the epileptogenic (EP) zone; however, distinguishing them from waveforms is difficult. This study hypothesized that the nocturnal synchronization of hippocampal ripples and cortical delta power classifies EP and physiological hippocampi. MethodsWe enrolled 38 patients with electrodes implanted in the hippocampus or the parahippocampal gyrus between April 2014 and March 2023 at our institution. We classified 11 patients (11 hippocampi) into the EP group, who were pathologically diagnosed with hippocampal sclerosis, and five patients (six hippocampi) into the non-epileptogenic (NE) group, whose hippocampi had no epileptogenicity. Hippocampal ripples were detected using intracranial electroencephalography of the hippocampal or parahippocampal electrodes and presented as ripple rates per second. Cortical delta power (0.5-4 Hz) was assessed using cortical electrodes. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the ripple rates and the cortical delta power (CRD) was calculated for the intracranial electroencephalographic signals obtained every night during the recordings. ResultsHippocampal ripples detected from continuous recording for approximately 10 days demonstrated similar frequency characteristics between the EP and NE groups. However, CRDs in the EP group (mean [standard deviation]: 0.20 [0.049]) were significantly lower than those in the NE group (0.67 [0.070], F (1,124) = 29.6, p < 0.0001 (group), F (9,124) = 1.0, p = 0.43 (day); two-way analysis of variance). Based on the minimum CRDs during the 10-day recordings, the two groups were classified with 94.1% accuracy. ConclusionCRD is a biomarker of hippocampal epileptogenicity. Key PointsThe correlation between hippocampal ripple rate and cortical delta power was evaluated for approximately 10 days in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Mean correlation coefficients were significantly lower in the epileptogenic group than in the non-epileptogenic group. The minimum value of the correlation coefficients predicts hippocampal sclerosis.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
3
Epilepsia Open
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
5
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
6
Epilepsy Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
13
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
14
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
16
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
22
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%