Investigating the impact of London's Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) on children's health: cohort description and baseline data from the Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) prospective parallel cohort study
Wood, H. E.; Kalsi, H.; Cross, L.; Dove, R. E.; Scales, J.; Tsocheva, I.; Chavda, J.; Colligan, G.; Lie, E.; Petrovic, K.; Tomini, F.; Toffolutti, V.; Day, B.; Keighley, A.; Critchlow, C.; Beevers, S.; Fletcher, M.; Gauderman, W. J.; Grigg, J.; Mihaylova, B.; Newby, C.; van Sluijs, E.; Kelly, F.; Sheikh, A.; Randhawa, G.; Mudway, I. S.; Griffiths, C. J.
Show abstract
Traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) poses significant health risks particularly for children, with adverse effects that may impact health in later life. Low emission zones are a public health policy designed to reduce TRAP in urban areas. The CHILL (Childrens Health in London and Luton) Study will evaluate the impact of Londons Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) on childrens health, using a prospective two-arm parallel longitudinal cohort design. CHILL will examine associations between air pollution metrics and lung function growth, plus secondary outcomes. Here we describe the characteristics of the CHILL cohort at baseline, prior to the introduction of the ULEZ. We recruited 3414 children aged 6-9 years attending 84 schools (London - intervention site: 1664 children, 44 schools; Luton - comparator site: 1750 children, 40 schools). Baseline health assessments were conducted in 2018-2019 (before the introduction of the ULEZ in London). 97.0% of recruited children were assessed (London 96.5%, Luton 97.4%), with the primary outcome measure of post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second being successfully measured in 76.7% (London 76.9%, Luton 76.5%). 92.1% returned a completed parental questionnaire (London 89.3%, Luton 94.7%), including data for analysis of the secondary outcomes. Demographic characteristics and outcomes were similar across the two sites. We established well-matched cohorts of school children, in our intervention (London) and comparator (Luton) sites. Data on primary and secondary outcomes have been successfully collected, which, combined with detailed air quality metrics, provides a robust platform for evaluating the impact of Londons ULEZ on childrens health and development. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04695093 (05/01/2021)
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection: A test-negative case-control study with additional population controls 93%
- Turning green: the impact of changing to more eco-friendly respiratory healthcare. A carbon and cost analysis of Dutch prescription data 92%
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rural Roads to Cognitive Resilience (RRR): A prospective cohort study protocol 92%
- Mind the gap: Mapping Variation between National and Local Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Paediatric Asthma from the United Kingdom and the Netherlands 92%
- Evaluating the impact of Hazelwood mine fire event on students’ educational development with Bayesian interrupted time-series hierarchical meta-regression 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in adults exposed to fine particles from a coal mine fire 93%
- Long-term exposure to air pollution and risk of adult-onset asthma and COPD: Danish nationwide cohort study 91%
- Does the occurrence of a severe asthma exacerbation change the rate of subsequent events? 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 94%
- Air pollution exposure, respiratory consequences, and perceptions among urban African children living in poor conditions – a case study in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire 94%
- Within-country heterogeneity in patterns of social contact relevant for tuberculosis infection transmission, prevention, and care 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors for the Mitigation and Containment of a COVID-19 Outbreak in a Meat Processing Plant 92%
- Study Protocol and Rationale of “The UP Project”: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Active Breaks on Health Indicators in Desk-Based Workers 90%
- Long term impact on lung function of patients with moderate and severe COVID-19. A prospective cohort study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.