Back

Investigating the impact of London's Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) on children's health: cohort description and baseline data from the Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) prospective parallel cohort study

Wood, H. E.; Kalsi, H.; Cross, L.; Dove, R. E.; Scales, J.; Tsocheva, I.; Chavda, J.; Colligan, G.; Lie, E.; Petrovic, K.; Tomini, F.; Toffolutti, V.; Day, B.; Keighley, A.; Critchlow, C.; Beevers, S.; Fletcher, M.; Gauderman, W. J.; Grigg, J.; Mihaylova, B.; Newby, C.; van Sluijs, E.; Kelly, F.; Sheikh, A.; Randhawa, G.; Mudway, I. S.; Griffiths, C. J.

2024-06-05 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2024.06.05.24308482 medRxiv
Show abstract

Traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) poses significant health risks particularly for children, with adverse effects that may impact health in later life. Low emission zones are a public health policy designed to reduce TRAP in urban areas. The CHILL (Childrens Health in London and Luton) Study will evaluate the impact of Londons Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) on childrens health, using a prospective two-arm parallel longitudinal cohort design. CHILL will examine associations between air pollution metrics and lung function growth, plus secondary outcomes. Here we describe the characteristics of the CHILL cohort at baseline, prior to the introduction of the ULEZ. We recruited 3414 children aged 6-9 years attending 84 schools (London - intervention site: 1664 children, 44 schools; Luton - comparator site: 1750 children, 40 schools). Baseline health assessments were conducted in 2018-2019 (before the introduction of the ULEZ in London). 97.0% of recruited children were assessed (London 96.5%, Luton 97.4%), with the primary outcome measure of post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second being successfully measured in 76.7% (London 76.9%, Luton 76.5%). 92.1% returned a completed parental questionnaire (London 89.3%, Luton 94.7%), including data for analysis of the secondary outcomes. Demographic characteristics and outcomes were similar across the two sites. We established well-matched cohorts of school children, in our intervention (London) and comparator (Luton) sites. Data on primary and secondary outcomes have been successfully collected, which, combined with detailed air quality metrics, provides a robust platform for evaluating the impact of Londons ULEZ on childrens health and development. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04695093 (05/01/2021)

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.0%
2
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.5%
4
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
6
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
11
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.3%
15
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%