Back

Quantifying the relationship between time to command-following and outcomes after TBI: the 1% rule

Snider, S. B.; Deng, H.; Hammond, F. M.; Kowalski, R. G.; Walker, W. C.; Zafonte, R. D.; Giacino, J. T.; Puccio, A. M.; Bodien, Y. G.

2024-06-04 neurology
10.1101/2024.06.04.24308423 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceRecovery of command-following after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important prognostic indicator, however, the relationship between time to command-following and long-term functional outcome is not clear. ObjectiveEvaluate the association between command-following and outcome 1-year after TBI. Design Cohort study of participants with moderate-severe TBI in the TBI Model Systems (TBIMS) who were followed 1-year post injury, and validation in an independent dataset from the Brain Trauma Research Center (BTRC) database. SettingTBIMS is a multi-center study of participants with moderate-severe TBI treated in an inpatient rehabilitation hospital. The BTRC database is derived from a single US level 1 trauma center and includes patients with severe TBI. ParticipantsTBIMS: N=9,052 (mean{+/-}SD age 38{+/-}18 years, 76% male, 67% white); BTRC: N=228 (mean age 37{+/-}17 years, 76% male, 91% white). Participants did not follow commands on acute hospital admission and survived to discharge. ExposureDays to command-following during hospitalization. Main OutcomeGlasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score <4 (i.e., death or dependency) 1-year post TBI. ResultsParticipants in TBIMS were more likely than those in BTRC to follow commands during acute hospitalization (90% vs 63%; p<0.001) and had a shorter median time to command-following (5 vs 9.5 days; p< 0.001). For each additional week without command-following, the odds ratio for death or dependency at 1 year was 1.30 (95% CI: [1.26,1.35]; p<0.001) in TBIMS and 1.49 ([1.15, 1.97]; p=0.003) in BTRC. Time to command-following had an AUC of 0.61 [0.59, 0.63] in TBIMS and 0.65 [0.53, 0.76]) in BTRC. Each additional day without command-following was associated with a 1.18% (1.16%, 1.20%) increase in the proportion of participants with death or dependency at 1-year in TBIMS and 1.05% (0.99%, 1.11%) in BTRC. ConclusionTime to command-following after moderate-severe TBI is associated with 1-year outcomes, but the predictive accuracy of absence of command-following on any single post-injury day is limited. In two independent cohorts, the likelihood of death or dependency increased by [~]1% for each additional day without command-following. Clinicians should be cautious when prognosticating based on the absence of command-following in the first five weeks after TBI.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.