Back

FusOn-pLM: A Fusion Oncoprotein-Specific Language Model via Focused Probabilistic Masking

Vincoff, S.; Goel, S.; Kholina, K.; Pulugurta, R.; Vure, P.; Chatterjee, P.

2024-06-04 bioinformatics Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.06.03.597245 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fusion oncoproteins, a class of chimeric proteins arising from chromosomal translocations, drive and sustain various cancers, particularly those impacting children. Unfortunately, due to their intrinsically disordered nature, large size, and lack of well-defined, druggable pockets, they have been historically challenging to target therapeutically: neither small molecule-based methods nor structure-based approaches for binder design are strong options for this class of molecules. Recently, protein language models (pLMs) have demonstrated success at representing protein sequences with information-rich embeddings, enabling downstream design applications from sequence alone. However, no current pLM has been trained on fusion oncoprotein sequences and thus may not produce optimal representations for these proteins. In this work, we introduce FusOn-pLM, a novel pLM that fine-tunes the state-of-the-art ESM-2 model on fusion oncoprotein sequences. We specifically introduce a novel masked language modeling (MLM) strategy, employing a binding-site probability predictor to focus masking on key amino acid residues, thereby generating more optimal fusion oncoprotein-aware embeddings. Our model improves performance on both fusion oncoprotein-specific benchmarks and disorder prediction tasks in comparison to baseline ESM-2 representations, as well as manually-constructed biophysical embeddings, motivating downstream usage of FusOn-pLM embeddings for therapeutic design tasks targeting these fusions. We have made our model publicly available to the community at https://huggingface.co/ChatterjeeLab/FusOn-pLM.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.