Stimulus-specificity of surround-induced responses in primary visual cortex
Cuevas, N.; Sotomayor-Gomez, B.; Tzanou, A.; Onorato, I.; Rummell, B.; Uran, C.; Broggini, A.; Vinck, M.
Show abstract
Recent work suggests that stimuli in the surround can drive V1 neurons even without direct visual input to the classical receptive field (RF). These surround-induced responses may represent a prediction of the occluded stimulus, a prediction error, or alternatively, a representation of the gray patch covering the RF. Using Neuropixels recordings in mouse V1, we found that a distal surround stimulus increased V1 firing rates for gray patches up to 90{degrees} in diameter, while LGN firing rates decreased for the same stimuli. These responses occurred across a wide range of conditions: they were elicited by both moving and stationary surround stimuli, did not require spatial continuity or motion coherence, and persisted even for large gray patches (90{degrees}) where there was no mismatch between the classical RF stimulus ([~]20{degrees}) and the near surround. They also emerged when the gray patch appeared as a salient object against a uniform black or white background. Additionally, response magnitudes and latencies were highly similar for black/white uniform surface stimuli on a gray background, with latencies increasing with the gray-patch diameter. These findings are difficult to reconcile with the predictive coding interpretation and fit best with the hypothesis that surround-induced responses reflect the representation of the uniform surface itself and may thereby contribute to image segmentation processes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Visual feature tuning of superior colliculus neural reafferent responses after fixational microsaccades 98%
- Chilean brush tailed mouse (Octodon degus): a diurnal precocial rodent as a new model to study visual receptive field properties of superior colliculus neurons 97%
- Similar masking effects of natural backgrounds on detection performances in humans, macaques, and macaque-V1 population responses 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.