Back

Trait lability as a predictor of diversification dynamics in flowering plants

Boyko, J. D.; Vasconcelos, T.

2025-12-03 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.06.03.597046 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rates of diversification differ between angiosperm lineages. To date, attempts to explain this heterogeneity have focused on the potential correlation between speciation and extinction rates and particular key traits. However, an often-overlooked explanation is that evolutionary lability, here defined as the rates of trait change, may be a better predictor of speciation and extinction rate heterogeneity than the observed traits themselves. Here, we show how this can be tested by using hidden Markov models (HMMs), which allow for several rate classes associated with speciation, extinction, and transition between trait states across a phylogeny. Using a phylogenetic dataset of 13 angiosperm clades including 10,474 species, we show that higher rates of change between open and closed-canopy biomes is consistently associated with higher lineage turnover rates (speciation + extinction rates) across clades. We demonstrate how HMMs can be leveraged in ways that go beyond their conventional use as null models in diversification analyses, and that comparing different rate classes can unveil novel patterns of biological interest. These patterns result in a shift in focus from static traits to dynamic evolutionary processes and may provide a more comprehensive understanding into how biodiversity is generated and maintained, in angiosperms and other organisms.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
4
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.1%
6
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
7
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.2%
8
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
9
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.3%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.1%
12
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
20
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
21
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%