Back

Viral load monitoring practices and correlates of viral non-suppression among children and young adolescents living with HIV in level five hospitals in Kiambu county, Kenya

Gachoka, L. N.

2024-06-03 hiv aids
10.1101/2024.06.03.24308381 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHIV has been a major global public health issue among children and young adolescents living with HIV (CYALHIV), their viral suppression rates being lower compared to adults. Follow up through viral load monitoring may influence their health outcomes. ObjectiveIn a cross-sectional study we determined viral load monitoring practices and correlates of viral non-suppression of all CYALHIV in three level five hospitals in Kiambu county, Kenya MethodsWe abstracted data from electronic and paper medical records. Multivariable log binomial regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and assess correlates of non-suppression. Adherence to viral load testing guidelines was assessed. Viral non-suppression was defined as a VL >1000c/ml. ResultsOf the 252 CYALHIV, the median age was 11 (IQR: 7-13) years. Fourteen had non-suppression at last assessment. Correlates of non-suppression included having previously had TB [aPR=4.25; 95% CI=1.41-12.8; p=0.01], ART side effects [aPR=3.01; 95% CI=1.37-6.62 p=0.006] and having received enhanced adherence counselling [aPR =5.32; 95% CI=2.00-14.15; p=0.001]. Being on Dolutegravir was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of non-suppression (aPR=0.35; CI:0.15-0.85: p = 0.021). Timing of baseline VL tests improved through the years though there were gaps in routine VL monitoring and follow-up on unsuppressed results. ConclusionAt most current VL, 14% children were non-suppressed, higher than the 5% UNAIDS 2030 target. Special strategies on assessing and addressing corelates of non-suppression are essential for ART programs. Routine VL monitoring as per the guidelines was suboptimal despite increased access to VL testing, suggesting other barriers to VL monitoring.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.