Empowering patients across the maternal-newborn care continuum: A cluster randomized controlled trial testing a digital health platform in Kenya
Vatsa, R.; Chang, W.; Akinyi, S.; Little, S.; Gakii, C.; Mungai, J.; Kahumbura, C.; Wickramanayake, A.; Rajasekharan, S.; Cohen, J.; McConnell, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccelerating improvements in maternal and newborn healthcare is a major public health priority in Kenya. While utilization of formal healthcare has increased, many pregnant and postpartum women do not receive the recommended number of maternal care visits. Even when they do, visits are often short with many providers not offering important elements of evaluation and counseling, leaving gaps in womens knowledge and preparedness. Digital health tools have been proposed as a complement to care that is provided by maternity care facilities, with the potential to empower patients to receive the right care at the right place and time. However, there is limited evidence of the impact of digital health tools at scale on patients knowledge, preparedness, and the content of care they receive. We evaluated a digital health platform (PROMPTS) composed of informational messages, appointment reminders, and a two-way clinical helpdesk that has been implemented at scale in Kenya on six domains across the pregnancy-postpartum care continuum. Methods and FindingsWe conducted an unmasked, 1:1 parallel arm cluster randomized controlled trial in 40 health facilities (clusters) across eight counties in Kenya. 6,139 pregnant individuals were consented at baseline and followed through pregnancy and postpartum. Individuals recruited from treatment facilities were invited to enroll in the PROMPTS platform, with roughly 85% reporting take-up. Our outcomes were derived from phone surveys conducted with participants at 36-42 weeks of gestation and 7-8 weeks post-childbirth. Among eligible participants, 3,399/3,678 women completed antenatal follow-up, and 5,509/6,128 women completed postpartum follow-up, with response rates of 92% and 90%, respectively. Outcomes were organized into six domains: knowledge, preparedness, routine care seeking, danger sign care seeking, newborn care, and postpartum care content. We generated standardized summary indices to account for multiple hypothesis testing but also analyzed individual index components. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted for all outcomes at the individual level, with standard errors clustered by facility. Participants recruited from treatment facilities had a 0.08 standard deviation (SD) (95% CI: 0.03, 0.12) higher knowledge index, a 0.08 SD (95% CI: 0.02, 0.13) higher preparedness index, a 0.10 SD (95% CI: 0.05, 0.16) higher routine care seeking index, a 0.09 SD (95% CI: 0.07, 0.12) higher newborn care index, and a 0.06 SD (95% CI: 0.01, 0.12) higher postpartum care content index than those recruited from control facilities. No significant effect on the danger sign care seeking index was found (95% CI: -0.01, 0.08). A limitation of our study was that outcomes were self-reported, and the study was not powered to detect effects on health outcomes. ConclusionsDigital health tools indicate promise in filling gaps in pregnant and postpartum womens health care, amidst systems that fail to deliver a minimally adequate standard of care. Through providing patients with critical information and empowering them to seek recommended care, such tools can ensure that individuals are prepared for a safe childbirth and receive access to comprehensive, high quality postpartum care. Future work is needed to ascertain the impact of at-scale digital platforms like PROMPTS on health outcomes. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05110521; AEA RCT Registry ID: R-0008449
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Antenatal care coverage in a low-resource setting: estimations from the Birhan Cohort 95%
- Collecting mortality data via mobile phone surveys: a non-inferiority randomized trial in Malawi 94%
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated risk factors among first antenatal care attendees in Zambia, 2021-2022: a repeated cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of a home-based health, nutrition, and responsive stimulation intervention and conditional cash transfers on child development and growth: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Tanzania 95%
- Indirect Effects of COVID-19 on Maternal, Neonatal, Child, Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Kampala, Uganda 95%
- Factors Affecting Access to and Utilisation of Intravenous Iron to Treat Anaemia in Pregnancy in Zomba, Malawi: A Qualitative Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Maternal Outcomes of Young Mothers through mHealth and Community-Based Interventions: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Trial in Kwale County, Coastal Kenya 96%
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 96%
- Integration of stepped care for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders among women attending maternal and child health clinics in Kenya: Protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation on birth weight in Ethiopia: protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial 97%
- Birhan Maternal and Child Health cohort: a study protocol 96%
- Interventions in sexual and reproductive health services addressing violence against women in low- and middle- income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 95%
- Distance matters: barriers to antenatal care and safe childbirth in a migrant population on the Thailand-Myanmar border from 2007-2015, a pregnancy cohort study 94%
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.