A melancholy machine: simulated synapse loss induces depression-like behaviors in deep reinforcement learning
Chalmers, E.; Duarte, S.; Al-Hejji, X.; Devoe, D.; Gruber, A.; McDonald, R.
Show abstract
Deep Reinforcement Learning is a branch of artificial intelligence that uses artificial neural networks to model reward-based learning as it occurs in biological agents. Here we modify a Deep Reinforcement Learning approach by imposing a suppressive effect on the connections between neurons in the artificial network - simulating the effect of dendritic spine loss as observed in major depressive disorder (MDD). Surprisingly, this simulated spine loss is sufficient to induce a variety of MDD-like behaviors in the artificially intelligent agent, including anhedonia, increased temporal discounting, avoidance, and an altered exploration/exploitation balance. Furthermore, simulating alternative and longstanding reward-processing-centric conceptions of MDD (dysfunction of the dopamine system, altered reward discounting, context-dependent learning rates, increased exploration) does not produce the same range of MDD-like behaviors. These results support a conceptual model of MDD as a reduction of brain connectivity (and thus information-processing capacity) rather than an imbalance in monoamines - though the computational model suggests a possible explanation for the dysfunction of dopamine systems in MDD. Reversing the spine-loss effect in our computational MDD model can lead to rescue of rewarding behavior under some conditions. This supports the search for treatments that increase plasticity and synaptogenesis, and the model suggests some implications for their effective administration. Significance statementSimulating dendritic spine loss in a deep reinforcement learning agent causes the agent to exhibit a surprising range of depression-like behaviors. Simulating spine restoration allows rewarding behavior to be re-learned. This computational model sees Major Depressive Disorder as a reversible loss of brain capacity, providing some insights on pathology and treatment.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational Mechanisms Underlying Multi-Step Planning Deficits in Methamphetamine Use Disorder 91%
- Differential and spatial expression meta-analysis of genes identified in genome-wide association studies of depression 91%
- The Effects of Bipolar Disorder Granule Cell Hyperexcitability and Lithium Therapy on Pattern Separation in a Computational Model of the Dentate Gyrus 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.