Running, Fast and Slow: The Dorsal Striatum Sets the Cost of Movement During Foraging
Morvan, T.; Eloy, C.; Robbe, D.
Show abstract
During reward-oriented behaviors, animals -including humans- spontaneously adjust the speeds of their decisions and movements based on dynamically changing costs and benefits. The mechanisms constraining these adaptive modulations remain unclear, especially in freely moving animals. Here, we developed a naturalistic foraging task in which rats decided when and how fast to run across a motorized treadmill to collect rewards. Model-based analyses explained why decision and movement speeds were coupled or decoupled as rats adapted to changes in reward value or motor cost, respectively. Moreover, lesions of the dorsal striatum increased the animals sensitivity to motor cost, limiting their running speed in the most effortful conditions while sparing reward-related behavioral modulations. Altogether, our study describes how neuroeconomic constraints influence decision and movement speeds in foraging rats, and paves the way for a refined understanding of the role of the basal ganglia in motor control and decision-making.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mice in a labyrinth: Rapid learning, sudden insight, and efficient exploration 96%
- Accept-reject decision-making revealed via a quantitative and ethological study of C. elegans foraging 96%
- Walking Drosophila navigate complex plumes using stochastic decisions biased by the timing of odor encounters 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Normative Framework Dissociates Need and Motivation in Hypothalamic Neurons 96%
- Region-specific CREB function regulates distinct forms of regret associated with resilience versus susceptibility to chronic stress 96%
- Change-of-mind neuroeconomic decision-making is modulated by LINC00473 in medial prefrontal cortex in a sex-dependent manner 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.