Clinical Adherence to Concussion Practice Guidelines
Pelo, R.; Godfrey, J.; Dibble, L. E.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess common barriers to adherence to the Physical Therapy Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Practice Guidelines (PTCPG) and design an action plan to address these barriers. SettingSingle University Health System ParticipantsElectronic medical record (EMR) data were collected over an initial 6-month period and then a follow-up 6-month period after the interventions. The initial period yielded an average of 129 patients with a concussion diagnosis, and the follow-up period yielded an average of 331 patients. DesignThrough the knowledge-to-action framework, it was identified that providers were often unaware of current practice guidelines, and some had a low comfort level with the diagnosis. Subsequent action items to address these barriers included education sessions, modification of a concussion documentation template to better align with PTCPG recommendations, and the design of a pop-up within the electronic medical records that allowed providers to create a referral to a concussion treatment network. Main MeasuresFrequency calculations were performed based on whether the outcome measure was performed at any time during a concussion episode of care. Selection of outcome measures was determined by what outcome measures were available for use within the EMR and aligned with the PTCPG recommended system domains. Data was collected from the following providers: physical therapists, occupational therapists, sports medicine physicians and physical medicine & rehab physicians. ResultsFrom the initial EMR query to the follow-up, the following increases in use of outcome measures were seen with each outcome measure, Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) = 10.0%, Cervical & Thoracic Screen = 6.0%, Vestibular Ocular Motor Screen (VOMS) = 12.6%, Modified Orthostatic Vital Signs (MOVS) = 18.9%, Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) = 3.5%, Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) = -4.8%, Sensory Organization Test (SOT) = 0.9%. ConclusionThe improvement in adherence to recommendations was attributed to a knowledge to action approach that combined education along with structural changes to electronic medical record documentation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 90%
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 90%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Current Practice and Challenges in Screening for Visual Perception Deficits after Stroke: a Qualitative Study 94%
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 93%
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 91%
- Disparities in Access to, Use of, and Quality of Rehabilitation Care Following Stroke: A Scoping Review 91%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 93%
- Comparative Computed Tomography with Stress Manoeuvres for Diagnosing Distal Isolated Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injury in Acute Ankle Sprain: a Protocol for an Accuracy-Test Prospective Study. 92%
- Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: The PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol (ISRCTN 46948079) 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.