Back

Characterizing preserved autonomic regulation following spinal cord injury: Methods of a novel concerted testing battery and illustrative examples of a new translationally focused data representation

Solinsky, R.; Burns, K.; Hamner, J. W.; Singer, W.; Taylor, J. A.

2024-06-01 neurology
10.1101/2024.05.31.24308290 medRxiv
Show abstract

Autonomic dysfunction is common after spinal cord injury, though differing from motor and sensory function, there are currently no established batteries of tests to comprehensively characterize these deficits. Further, while individual established autonomic tests have a long history and sound scientific background, translating these autonomic testing results to inform clinical understanding is a major barrier. Herein, we outline a battery of six laboratory autonomic tests which were carefully curated to collectively describe the ability of individuals with spinal cord injury to inhibit and recruit sympathetic activity through the injured spinal cord. Presenting normative control data in 23 uninjured individuals completing this testing battery, we further demonstrate the utility of extracting three key testing metrics for each test, comparing these control results to 11 individuals with spinal cord injury. Results demonstrate strong normality of data with testing psychometrics suggesting reliable reproducibility on repeat testing. Further, even in this preliminary sample of individuals with spinal cord injuries, clear differences begin to emerge. This illustrates the ability of this collective testing battery to characterize autonomic regulation after spinal cord injury. To aid in clinical translation, we further present a graphical representation, an autonomic phenotype, which serves as a snapshot of how normal or abnormal sympathetic inhibition and recruitment of activation may be after spinal cord injury. Utilizing these autonomic phenotypes, three example cases of individuals with spinal cord injury highlight evidence of varied degrees of autonomically complete spinal cord injury. Together, this represents a key advancement in our understanding of autonomic function after spinal cord injury.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
3
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
6
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
9
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
10
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
13
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
15
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
17
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
19
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%