Back

Degree of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition Modulates Blood Pressure Response to Celecoxib and Naproxen

Theken, K. N.; Ghosh, S.; Skarke, C.; Fries, S.; Lahens, N. F.; Sarantopoulou, D.; Grant, G. R.; FitzGerald, G. A.; Grosser, T.

2024-05-31 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.05.30.24308244 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events via suppression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-derived prostacyclin (PGI2) formation in heart, vasculature, and kidney. The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety versus Ibuprofen Or Naproxen (PRECISION) trial and other large clinical studies compared the cardiovascular risk of traditional NSAIDs (i.e. naproxen), which inhibit both COX isozymes, with NSAIDs selective for COX-2 (i.e. celecoxib). However, whether pharmacologically equipotent doses were used - that is, whether a similar degree of COX-2 inhibition was achieved - was not considered. We compared drug target inhibition and blood pressure response to celecoxib at the dose used by most patients in PRECISION with the lowest recommended naproxen dose for osteoarthritis, which is lower than the dose used in PRECISION. MethodsSixteen healthy participants (19-61 years) were treated with celecoxib (100 mg every 12h), naproxen (250 mg every 12h), or placebo administered twice daily for seven days in a double-blind, crossover design randomized by order. On Day 7 when drug levels had reached steady state, the degree of COX inhibition was assessed ex vivo and in vivo. Ambulatory blood pressure was measured throughout the final 12h dosing interval. ResultsBoth NSAIDs inhibited COX-2 activity relative to placebo, but naproxen inhibited COX-2 activity to a greater degree (62.9{+/-}21.7%) than celecoxib (35.7{+/-}25.2%; p<0.05). Similarly, naproxen treatment inhibited PGI2 formation in vivo (48.0{+/-}24.9%) to a greater degree than celecoxib (26.7{+/-}24.6%; p<0.05). Naproxen significantly increased blood pressure compared to celecoxib (differences in least-square means of mean arterial pressure: 2.5 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.5, 3.5); systolic blood pressure: 4.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.9, 5.1); diastolic blood pressure: 1.8 mm Hg (95% CI: 0.8, 2.8); p<0.05 for all). The difference in systolic blood pressure relative to placebo was associated with the degree of COX-2 inhibition (p<0.05). ConclusionsCelecoxib 200 mg/day inhibited COX-2 activity to a lesser degree than naproxen 500 mg/day, resulting in a less pronounced blood pressure increase. While the PRECISION trial concluded the non-inferiority of celecoxib regarding cardiovascular risk, this is based on a comparison of doses that are not equipotent. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02502006 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02502006) Clinical PerspectiveO_LINaproxen 250 mg twice a day inhibited COX-2 activity to a greater degree than celecoxib 100 mg twice a day. C_LIO_LIThe degree of COX-2 inhibition was associated with the increase in systolic blood pressure with NSAID treatment relative to placebo. C_LIO_LIDose and its pharmacological potency achieved in vivo should be considered when evaluating the relative cardiovascular safety of COX-2-selective vs. non-selective NSAIDs. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.4%
3
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.7%
6
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.7%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.2%
8
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.0%
10
Molecular Pharmacology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Hypertension
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
13
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
17
Virology Journal
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
18
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
19
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
21
Acta Physiologica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
22
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Life Sciences
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%