Back

Degree of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition Modulates Blood Pressure Response to Celecoxib and Naproxen

Theken, K. N.; Ghosh, S.; Skarke, C.; Fries, S.; Lahens, N. F.; Sarantopoulou, D.; Grant, G. R.; FitzGerald, G. A.; Grosser, T.

2024-05-31 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.05.30.24308244
Show abstract

BackgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events via suppression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-derived prostacyclin (PGI2) formation in heart, vasculature, and kidney. The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety versus Ibuprofen Or Naproxen (PRECISION) trial and other large clinical studies compared the cardiovascular risk of traditional NSAIDs (i.e. naproxen), which inhibit both COX isozymes, with NSAIDs selective for COX-2 (i.e. celecoxib). However, whether pharmacologically equipotent doses were used - that is, whether a similar degree of COX-2 inhibition was achieved - was not considered. We compared drug target inhibition and blood pressure response to celecoxib at the dose used by most patients in PRECISION with the lowest recommended naproxen dose for osteoarthritis, which is lower than the dose used in PRECISION. MethodsSixteen healthy participants (19-61 years) were treated with celecoxib (100 mg every 12h), naproxen (250 mg every 12h), or placebo administered twice daily for seven days in a double-blind, crossover design randomized by order. On Day 7 when drug levels had reached steady state, the degree of COX inhibition was assessed ex vivo and in vivo. Ambulatory blood pressure was measured throughout the final 12h dosing interval. ResultsBoth NSAIDs inhibited COX-2 activity relative to placebo, but naproxen inhibited COX-2 activity to a greater degree (62.9{+/-}21.7%) than celecoxib (35.7{+/-}25.2%; p<0.05). Similarly, naproxen treatment inhibited PGI2 formation in vivo (48.0{+/-}24.9%) to a greater degree than celecoxib (26.7{+/-}24.6%; p<0.05). Naproxen significantly increased blood pressure compared to celecoxib (differences in least-square means of mean arterial pressure: 2.5 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.5, 3.5); systolic blood pressure: 4.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.9, 5.1); diastolic blood pressure: 1.8 mm Hg (95% CI: 0.8, 2.8); p<0.05 for all). The difference in systolic blood pressure relative to placebo was associated with the degree of COX-2 inhibition (p<0.05). ConclusionsCelecoxib 200 mg/day inhibited COX-2 activity to a lesser degree than naproxen 500 mg/day, resulting in a less pronounced blood pressure increase. While the PRECISION trial concluded the non-inferiority of celecoxib regarding cardiovascular risk, this is based on a comparison of doses that are not equipotent. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02502006 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02502006) Clinical PerspectiveO_LINaproxen 250 mg twice a day inhibited COX-2 activity to a greater degree than celecoxib 100 mg twice a day. C_LIO_LIThe degree of COX-2 inhibition was associated with the increase in systolic blood pressure with NSAID treatment relative to placebo. C_LIO_LIDose and its pharmacological potency achieved in vivo should be considered when evaluating the relative cardiovascular safety of COX-2-selective vs. non-selective NSAIDs. C_LI

Matching journals

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
#1
294× avg
2
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Wiley · based on 21 published papers
Top 0.2%
95× avg
3
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.1%
99× avg
4
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
#1
76× avg
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 27 published papers
Top 0.7%
26× avg
6
Atherosclerosis
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 0.9%
23× avg
7
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 83%
2.5%
8
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
American Society for Microbiology · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.6%
25× avg
9
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 12%
2.1× avg
10
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 19%
1.4%
11
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 32%
1.4%
12
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 79%
1.3%
13
Trials
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 24 published papers
Top 3%
5.5× avg
14
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
14× avg
15
Hypertension
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 20 published papers
Top 3%
5.4× avg
16
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 16%
0.7%
17
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 52%
0.7%
18
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Society (ERS) · based on 44 published papers
Top 6%
2.3× avg
19
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 12%
0.7%
20
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 11%
0.7%