Back

Multimodality Integration of Neural Social Activation and Social and Language Scores Reveals Three Replicable Profound and Milder Autism Subtypes With Divergent Clinical Outcomes

Taluja, V.; Nazari, S.; Zahiri, J.; Garmire, L.; Pierce, K.; Xiao, Y.; Courchesne, E.

2024-05-31 pediatrics
10.1101/2024.05.30.24308230 medRxiv
Show abstract

Social affective and communication symptoms stand at the center of autism, and usually become apparent within the first 1-3 years of life. Symptom severity differs widely across toddlers and clinical outcomes, ranging from near-neurotypical to poor. The biological bases of this early and wide symptom diversity are largely unknown. While more than two dozen studies have attempted to subgroup early-age clinical heterogeneity, most studies fail to rigorously validate discovered subtypes using multiple methods, and none linked observed clinical subtypes with underlying functional neural signatures. Using a well-established approach for precision medicine patient subtyping (Similarity Network Fusion) and multiple rigorous validation methods, we integrated thoroughly replicated measures of social neurofunctional activation and social and language ability in 137 toddlers at early ages. Results identified three distinct social neural-clinical ASD subtypes, validated using multiple methods. One subtype was consistent with a profound autism profile with negligible social neural activation, severe social and language symptoms, low social interest, and little clinical improvement. Another ASD subtype had a contrasting pattern with only mildly reduced social neural activity, near neurotypical social and language abilities, and substantial age-related clinical improvement. One principal implication of these results is that the "spectrum" of ASD heterogeneity is not truly a continuous spectrum from the neurobiological and clinical perspective. The profound autism subtype is the neurofunctional, clinical and developmental opposite of the mild ASD subtype, suggesting different etiological mechanisms. A second implication is that neurobiological and clinical subtype differences highlight the need to develop subtype-specific treatments, particularly for the profound subtype. Third, treatment studies with an undetermined mix of subtypes could fail or succeed based on how many patients from each subtype are included in the mix.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.3%
5
Autism Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
6
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
8
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
11
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Molecular Autism
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.3%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
20
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.9%
24
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
American Journal of Psychiatry
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
28
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%