Individual differences in the expression and control of anger are encoded in the same fronto-temporal GM-WM network
Grecucci, A.; Geraci, F.; Munari, E.; Yi, X.; Salvato, G.; Messina, I.
Show abstract
Anger can be deconstructed into distinct components: a temporary emotional state (state anger), a stable personality trait (trait anger), a tendency to outwardly express it (anger-out), or to internally suppress it (anger-in), and the capability to manage it (anger control). These aspects exhibit individual differences that vary across a continuum. Notably, the capacity to express and control anger are of great importance to modulate our reactions in interpersonal situations. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that anger expression and control are negatively correlated and that both can be decoded by the same patterns of grey and white matter features of a fronto-temporal brain network. To this aim, a data fusion unsupervised machine learning technique, known as transposed Independent Vector Analysis (tIVA), was used to decompose the brain into covarying GM-WM networks and then backward regression was used to predict both anger expression and control from a sample of 212 healthy subjects. Confirming our hypothesis, results showed that anger control and anger expression are negatively correlated, the more individuals control anger, the less they externalize it. At the neural level, individual differences in anger expression and control can be predicted by the same GM-WM network. As expected, this network included fronto-temporal regions as well as the cingulate, the insula and the precuneus. The higher the concentration of GM-WM in this brain network, the higher level of externalization of anger, and the lower the anger control. These results expand previous findings regarding the neural bases of anger by showing that individual differences in anger control and expression can be predicted by morphometric features.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Subsystem Mechanism of Default Mode Network Underlying Rumination: a Reproducible Neuroimaging Study 96%
- Conscientiousness associated with efficiency of the salience/ventral attention network: Replication in three samples using individualized parcellation 96%
- Intrinsic, dynamic and effective connectivity among large-scale brain networks modulated by oxytocin 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Ego Dissolution and Emotional Arousal During the Psychedelic State 96%
- Hemispheric asymmetries in resting-state EEG and fMRI are related to approach and avoidance behaviour, but not to eating behaviour or BMI 96%
- Tensorial Independent Component Analysis Reveals Social and Reward Networks Associated with Major Depressive Disorder 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Graph analysis of the guilt network highlights associations with subclinical anxiety and self-blame 98%
- Studying the precuneus reveals structure-function-affect correlation in long-term meditators 96%
- Neural responses to instructed positive couple interaction: An fMRI study on compliment sharing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intersubject representational similarity analysis uncovers the impact of state anxiety on brain activation patterns in the human extrastriate cortex 95%
- Memory Retrieval Effects as a Function of Differences in Phenomenal Experience 93%
- Oxytocin effects on the resting-state mentalizing brain network 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Narcissus reflected: gray and white matter features joint contribution to the default mode network in predicting narcissistic personality traits 98%
- Temporal dynamics of cognitive flexibility in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: a high density EEG study 94%
- Connectome-based predictive modeling of cognitive reserve using task-based functional connectivity 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.