Back

Bioinformatics analysis of the potential biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis and Guillain-Barre syndrome

Kwok, T.; Huerta-White, T.; Briegel, K.; Singh, A.; Yeguvapalli, S.; Chitrala, K. N.

2024-06-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.05.29.595759 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent research emphasizes the intricate interplay of genetics and epigenetics in neurological disorders, notably Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), both of which exhibit cardiovascular dysregulation, with GBS often featuring serious bradyarrhythmias requiring prompt recognition and treatment. While cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in MS is typically less severe, orthostatic intolerance affects around half of MS patients. Their distinction lies in their autoimmune responses, MS is an autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system, causes demyelination and axon damage, leading to cognitive, ocular, and musculoskeletal dysfunction. In contrast, GBS primarily affects the peripheral nervous system, resulting in paralysis and respiratory complications. Despite their differences, both diseases share environmental risk factors such as viral infections and Vitamin D deficiency. This study aims to explore shared gene expression pathways, functional annotations, and molecular pathways between MS and GBS to enhance diagnostics, pathogenesis understanding, and treatment strategies through molecular analysis techniques. Through the gene expression analysis, five significant genes were found UTS2, TNFSF10, GBP1, VCAN, FOS. Results shows that Common DEGs are linked to apoptosis, bacterial infections, and atherosclerosis. Molecular docking analysis suggests Aflatoxin B1 as a potential therapeutic compound due to its high binding affinity with common differentially expressed proteins.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.