Back

Modeling disease progression in spinocerebellar ataxias

Georgii, E.; Klockgether, T.; Jacobi, H.; Schmitz-Huebsch, T.; Ashizawa, T.; Kuo, S.-H.; ESMI study group, ; EUROSCA study group, ; RISCA study group, ; CRC-SCA study group, ; SCA Registry study group, ; Faber, J.

2024-05-31 neurology
10.1101/2024.05.29.24308162 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and objectivesThe most common autosomal-dominantly inherited spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA), SCA1, SCA2, SCA3 and SCA6, account for more than half of all SCA families. Disease course is characterized by progressive ataxia and additional neurological signs. Each of these SCAs is caused by a CAG repeat expansion, leading to an expanded polyglutamine stretch in the resulting type-specific protein. To comparatively investigate determinants of disease progression, we analyzed demographic and genetic data and three-year clinical time courses of neurological symptoms. The aim was to provide tailored marker candidates and prediction models to support type-specific clinical monitoring and trial design. MethodsTo analyze relationships among the different neurological symptoms, we examined co-occurrence patterns of deterioration events. Predicting disease progression was treated as a survival analysis problem. ResultsThe data set contained 1538 subjects from five different longitudinal cohorts and 3802 visits. The pattern of neurological symptoms that showed progression varied with the SCA type. Mining of the progression data revealed the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) sum score to be the most representative descriptor of disease progression, reflecting progression of the majority of the other included symptoms. We trained models for predicting the progression of each neurological symptom for each SCA type from genetic features, age and symptoms at the baseline visit. The most universal predictors included the SARA sum score, gait and the CAG repeat length of the expanded allele. Finally, deterioration in disease staging was studied in detail: For the milestones of deterioration, (i) the need to use walking aids and (ii) the requirement to use a wheelchair, we discovered common as well as diverging predictive markers. For clinical interpretability, a decision tree was built to indicate the probability of progression within 3 years in dependence of the top predictive features. DiscussionData-driven approaches are potent tools to identify the main contributing features of progression prediction. Progression events for the disease stage were predictable from the baseline neurological status. Remarkably, a limited number of features had predictive importance, and only few were shared among all four SCA types, including gait and the SARA sum score, confirming the need for type-specific models.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
3
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.3%
12
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
13
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
14
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
15
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
16
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
19
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
20
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
29
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%