Sex and Marital-Status Differences in Delayed Initiation for Pharyngeal Cancer Treatment, Before and After Medicaid Expansion
Semprini, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn the United States, pharyngeal cancer has become the most common type of head and neck cancer, with 80% of cases found in males. Although disparities in treatment delays have been observed in pharyngeal patients, less is known about how policies facilitate timely care. This study aimed to estimate the association between Medicaid expansion and delaying initiation of pharyngeal cancer treatment. MethodologyWe extracted Surveillance, Epidemiological, End Results (SEER) case data to analyze pharyngeal cancers diagnosed between 2000-2018. The outcome of interest was a binary variable indicating if the patient initiated treatment two or more months after diagnosis. We conducted subgroup analyses by sex, marital status, and type of treatment received (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, post-operative radiation, systemic therapy). We implement the Matrix Completion algorithm to account for staggered rollout of Medicaid expansion within our difference-in-differences design. ResultsOur sample included 79,433 patients diagnosed with pharynx cancer. Delayed treatment was lowest among married females receiving systemic therapy (5%), and highest among married males and females not recommended to receive surgery (43%). Generally, there was no association between Medicaid expansion and changes in delayed treatment. Subgroup analyses show that Medicaid expansion was associated with reduced treatment delays in unmarried females receiving systemic therapy (-4.5%-points), and married males receiving chemotherapy (Est. = -2.6%-points), radiotherapy (Est. = -3.1%-points), and married males not recommended to receive surgery (Est. = -4.6%-points). ConclusionsGiven the importance of timely pharyngeal cancer treatment, health systems must identify and address the drivers of treatment delays to advance cancer equity.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Childhood Cancer Survival in the Highly Vulnerable Population of South Texas: A Cohort Study 92%
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 91%
- Time trends, factors associated with, and reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a massive online survey of US adults: January-May 2021 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lost Opportunity in Tobacco Cessation Care: The Impact of Underbilling in a Large Health System 92%
- Time trends between vaccination coverage and voting patterns before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of COVID-19 and flu surveys in the United States 91%
- Associations between governor political affiliation and COVID-19 cases and deaths in the United States 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy January-March 2021 among 18-64 year old US adults by employment and occupation 90%
- Associations of Race/Ethnicity and Other Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors with Vaccine Initiation and Intention During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States 90%
- COVID-19 booster vaccine attitudes and behaviors among university students and staff: the USC Trojan Pandemic Research Initiative 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer incidence and mortality in Canada 93%
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 92%
- Age-related differences in cancer relative survival in the US: a SEER-18 analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Screening and Treatment in Older Adults: The Multiethnic Cohort Study 93%
- Understanding disruptions in cancer care to reduce increased cancer burden 93%
- The impact of lag time to cancer diagnosis and treatment on clinical outcomes prior to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.