Methylome-wide studies of six metabolic traits
Smith, H. M.; Ng, H. K.; Moodie, J. E.; Gadd, D. A.; McCartney, D. L.; Bernabeu, E.; Campbell, A.; Redmond, P.; Taylor, A.; Page, D.; Corley, J.; Harris, S. E.; Tay, D.; Deary, I. J.; Evans, K. L.; Robinson, M. R.; Chambers, J. C.; Loh, M.; Cox, S. R.; Marioni, R. E.; Hillary, R. F.
Show abstract
Exploring the molecular correlates of metabolic health measures may identify the shared and unique biological processes and pathways that they track. Here, we performed epigenome-wide association studies (EWASs) of six metabolic traits: body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, waist-hip ratio (WHR), and blood-based measures of glucose, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and total cholesterol. We considered blood-based DNA methylation (DNAm) from >750,000 CpG sites in over 17,000 volunteers from the Generation Scotland (GS) cohort. Linear regression analyses identified between 304 and 11,815 significant CpGs per trait at P<3.6x10-8, with 37 significant CpG sites across all six traits. Further, we performed a Bayesian EWAS that jointly models all CpGs simultaneously and conditionally on each other, as opposed to the marginal linear regression analyses. This identified between 3 and 27 CpGs with a posterior inclusion probability [≥] 0.95 across the six traits. Next, we used elastic net penalised regression to train epigenetic scores (EpiScores) of each trait in GS, which were then tested in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936; European ancestry) and Health for Life in Singapore (HELIOS; Indian-, Malay- and Chinese-ancestries). A maximum of 27.1% of the variance in BMI was explained by the BMI EpiScore in the subset of Malay-ancestry Singaporeans. Four metabolic EpiScores were associated with general cognitive function in LBC1936 in models adjusted for vascular risk factors (Standardised {beta}range: 0.08 - 0.12, PFDR < 0.05). EpiScores of metabolic health are applicable across ancestries and can reflect differences in brain health.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An atlas of associations between polygenic risk scores from across the human phenome and circulating metabolic biomarkers 94%
- Maternal smoking DNA methylation risk score associated with health outcomes in offspring of European and South Asian ancestry 94%
- Risk factors affecting polygenic score performance across diverse cohorts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Twin pair analysis uncovers novel links between DNA methylation, mitochondrial DNA quantity and obesity 94%
- Systematic discovery of gene-environment interactions underlying the human plasma proteome in UK Biobank 94%
- A novel Mendelian randomization method identifies causal relationships between gene expression and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNAm scores for serum GDF15 and NT-proBNP levels associate with a range of traits affecting the body and brain 96%
- Epigenetic clocks predict prevalence and incidence of leading causes of death and disease burden 95%
- DNA methylation modules associate with incident cardiovascular disease and cumulative risk factor exposure 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex-specific phenotypic effects and evolutionary history of an ancient polymorphic deletion of the human growth hormone receptor 92%
- PhenomeXcan: Mapping the genome to the phenome through the transcriptome 92%
- Likelihood based Mendelian randomization analysis with automated instrument selection and horizontal pleiotropic modeling 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene-vegetarianism interactions in calcium, testosterone, and eGFR identified in genome-wide analysis across 30 biomarkers 94%
- Causal relationships between obesity and the leading causes of death in women and men 93%
- Genome-wide methylation data improves dissection of the effect of smoking on body mass index. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.