Back

A Dose-Response Model for Accurate Detection and Quantification of Transcriptome-Wide Gene Knockdown for Oligonucleotide-Based Medicines

Pekker, D.; Kuntz, S.; Nicholson-Shaw, T.; Yanke, S.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; McArthur, M.

2024-05-29 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2024.05.28.596270 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Synthetic antisense oligonucleotides and siRNAs are a class of Oligonucleotide-Based Medicines (OBMs) that can hybridize with pre-mRNA and mRNA, recruit a mechanism-of-action specific enzymatic complex, and knockdown target gene expression. This class of molecules provides an excellent substrate for designing precision gene-modulatory therapeutics; however, quantifying on- and off-target dose response as measured by next-generation sequencing for this class of therapeutics has remained under-powered and ambiguous. Often in silico predictions of off-targets (ranked by edit tolerance) are used as putative off-target analysis in ASO and siRNA drug design. We construct a simple, effective theory of transcriptional dynamics and enzymatic activity in order to describe the transcriptome-wide response to these oligonucleotides. We establish rigorous quantification methods of off-target analysis in oligonucleotide drug design. We also extend the DESeq work [1, 2] of Negative Binomial noise in gene expression measurements to describe noise, including outliers, in OBM-dose response NGS experiments. We demonstrate the performance of our model on both synthetic and experimental Digital Gene Expression (DGE) data of dose response in ASO-treated cells. We present our analysis package, DoReSeq, as a freely available resource for the community. We hope this will elevate the standards of off-target analysis for such an important class of precision therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.