Pentavalent Vaccine: How Safe Is It Among Infants Accessing Immunization In Nigerian Health Facilities
Elemuwa, U. G.; Ehijie, E.; Elemuwa, C. O.; Elemuwa, T. D.; Raimi, M. O.
10.1101/2024.05.28.24307998 medRxivShow abstract
RationalePentavalent vaccines offer significant public health benefits by protecting against five major diseases with a single injection. However, concerns have been raised in various studies regarding potential associations between combined vaccines and conditions such as autism, febrile seizures, sudden unexpected death in infancy, demyelinating disorders, and neurodevelopmental disorders. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the safety of pentavalent vaccines administered to infants aged between 6 and 14 weeks. MethodsA total of 423 infants, all aged 6 weeks and receiving their first pentavalent vaccine at selected healthcare facilities, were recruited for the study after obtaining informed consent from their mothers or caregivers. The infants were administered three doses of the vaccine at 6, 10, and 14 weeks. Mothers and caregivers were provided with diaries and thermometers to monitor and record any Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) observed in their babies after each vaccine dose. Follow-up was conducted through telephone calls to ensure accurate monitoring and recording of any identified events. ResultsThe study identified variou AEFIs in the infants following their routine immunizations. These included pain at the injection site, fever, swelling at the injection site, vomiting, refusal to feed, excessive crying, coughing, rash, stooling, restlessness, and severe local reactions. Fever was the most commonly reported systemic AEFI, with incidence rates decreasing from 66.98% after the first dose to 55.37% after the third dose. Pain and swelling at the injection site were the most frequently reported local AEFIs, with their incidence also decreasing from the first to the third doses. No statistically significant differences were observed in the occurrence of AEFIs across the three doses. ConclusionsThe pentavalent vaccine was found to be safe for infants in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nigeria, with the observed AEFIs being generally mild and decreasing in frequency with subsequent doses. RecommendationsFurther studies should be conducted to monitor long-term safety and potential rare adverse effects of pentavalent vaccines. Additionally, public health education should emphasize the safety and benefits of pentavalent vaccines to increase vaccination rates and reduce vaccine hesitancy. Significance StatementThis study underscores the safety of pentavalent vaccines in infants, reinforcing their role in preventing multiple serious diseases through a single immunization schedule. The findings support the continued use and promotion of pentavalent vaccines in public health programs, particularly in regions with high infant mortality rates and limited healthcare resources.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity 95%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity after booster dose with AZD1222 via intradermal route among adult who had received CoronaVac 95%
- Immunogenicity and Safety of a 14-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PNEUBEVAX 14TM) administered to 6-8 weeks old healthy Indian Infants: A single blind, randomized, active-controlled, Phase-III study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 97%
- Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies in vaccinated and vaccine naïve adult Nigerians 97%
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The burden of vaccine hesitancy for routine immunization in Yaounde-Cameroon: restrictive sampling technique 96%
- Improving the last mile delivery of vaccines through an informed push model: experiences, opportunities and costs based on an implementation study in a rural district in Uganda 96%
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.