Back

Pseudo batch transformation: A novel method to correct for mass removal through sample withdrawal of fed-batch fermentations

Hesselberg-Thomsen, V.; Groves, T.; McCubbin, T.; Marin de Mas, I.; Martinez-Monge, I.; Nielsen, L. K.

2024-06-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.05.27.596043 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SummaryWe present a novel "pseudo batch" transformation algorithm that maps analytical data obtained for fed-batch bioreactor cultivations onto a constant volume batch process, significantly decreasing the complexity of characterizing the fed-batch process. Availability and implementationOur method is implemented in both Excel and Python and is available with tutorials and example data from https://github.com/biosustain/pseudobatch. The Python package is also available on PYPI under the name "pseudobatch". ContactLars Keld Nielsen, e-mail: lars.nielsen@uq.edu.au Supplementary informationA comprehensive explanation of the simulated fed-batch, parameter estimation procedures, and the Bayesian model can be found in supplementary information (S1-S5).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.5%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.2%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
5.8%
Similar papers in this journal
5
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
Metabolic Engineering
○ 75 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
7
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.9%
9
Water Research
○ 79 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.6%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Metabolites
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
13
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
16
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
17
BMC Methods
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
○ 427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
ISME Communications
◐ 120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
Analytical Chemistry
● 218 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Metabolic Engineering Communications
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
27
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.5%
28
Biotechnology Journal
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.