Back

SwiftTCR: Efficient Computational Docking protocol of TCRpMHC-I Complexes Using Restricted Rotation Matrices

Parizi, F. M.; Aarts, Y. J. M.; Eerden, S.; Ramakrishnan, G.; Xue, L. C.

2024-08-22 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.05.27.596020 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The T cells ability to discern self and non-self depends on its T cell receptor (TCR), which recognizes peptides presented by MHC molecules. Understanding this TCR-peptide-MHC (TCRpMHC) interaction is important for cancer immunotherapy design, tissue transplantation, pathogen identification, and autoimmune disease treatments. Understanding the intricacies of TCR recognition, encapsulated in TCRpMHC structures, remains challenging due to the immense diversity of TCRs (>108/individual), rendering experimental determination and general-purpose computational docking impractical. Addressing this gap, we have developed a rapid integrative modeling protocol leveraging unique docking patterns in TCRpMHC complexes. Built upon PIPER, our pipeline significantly cuts down FFT rotation sets, exploiting the consistent polarized docking angle of TCRs at pMHC. Additionally, our ultra-fast structure superimposition tool, GradPose, accelerates clustering. It models a case in 3-4 minutes on 12 CPUs, showcasing a speedup of up to 25-40 times compared to the ClusPro webserver. On a benchmark set of 38 TCRpMHC class I (TCRpMHC-I) complexes, our protocol outperforms the state-of-the-art docking tools in model quality. This protocol can potentially provide structural information to TCR repertoires targeting specific peptides. Its computational efficiency can also enrich existing pMHC-specific single-cell sequencing TCR data, facilitating the development of structure-based deep learning (DL) algorithms. These insights are essential for understanding T cell recognition and specificity, advancing the development of therapeutic interventions.

Published in Briefings in Bioinformatics (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.