Using Retinal diagnostics as a Biomarker for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Protocol for a systematic review.
Sahin, Z.; Pisani, S.; Nderitu, P.; Venkataraman, A. V.; Guu, T.-W.; Aarsland, D.; Jackson, T.; ffytche, D.
Show abstract
IntroductionRetinal neurodegeneration has recently been shown to occur in tandem with neurodegenerative disease. In the expectation that disease modifying treatments for Alzheimers Disease and Parkinsons Disease will soon become available, it will be important to have clinically useful biomarkers for neurodegenerative disease subtyping to guide early diagnosis, inform on prognosis and stratify subgroups for treatment. Understanding differences in detectable retina changes in individuals with different neurodegenerative disease subtypes is therefore fundamental. The emerging field of oculomics posits that systemic and neurodegenerative disease can be characterised using detectable ocular biomarkers within retinal diagnostics. The aim of this review is to compare the performance of common retinal imaging modalities in neurodegenerative disease detection and subtyping. Methods and analysisThis protocol has been developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligible studies will have reported using retinal diagnostic tools defined as Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA), Colour Fundus Photography (CFP) and Electroretinography (ERG) in individuals with neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimers Disease (AD), Parkinsons Disease (PD), Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB), Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), Vascular Dementia (VaD), and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). There will be no time restrictions placed in these searches. Studies not written in English, not peer-reviewed and grey literature will be excluded. Screening for eligible studies and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers, using predefined inclusion criteria. Any disagreements between the reviewers will be settled by discussion, and if required, third senior reviewer arbitration. The systematic review primary outcome is the performance of retinal diagnostics, namely OCT, OCTA, CFP, and ERG in the detection and subtyping of aforementioned neurodegenerative diseases. The secondary outcome is to evaluate the association between changes in retinal diagnostic features (e.g. retinal layer thicknesses) and neurodegenerative disease subtypes. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tool. A narrative synthesis approach will be used to analyse the results, with meta-analysis performed if there is sufficient data. Ethics and DisseminationEthical approval for this manuscript is not required, as this is a protocol for a systematic review and therefore no data are to be collected. Findings for this systematic review will be disseminated as a peer-reviewed publication and presentations at national and international symposiums including International Lewy body Dementia Conference, International Congress of Parkinsons Disease and Movement Disorders, The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. PROSPERO Registration NumberCRD42023434024 STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY{blacksquare} Our aim is to perform a comprehensive systematic review of the performance of retinal diagnostic methods, namely OCT, OCTA, CFP, and ERG in neurodegenerative disease subtyping. {blacksquare}We will use the carefully defined methodology in accordance with the Cochrane handbook, and the results of this systematic review will be reported as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) statement. {blacksquare}The certainty of this systematic review may be limited due to the small sample of studies for Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB), Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), and Vascular Dementia (VaD).
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol 91%
- Returning Research Results That Indicate Risk of Alzheimer Disease Dementia to Healthy Participants in Longitudinal Studies (WeSHARE) 91%
- Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning in Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Normative Database of A-Scan Data Using the Heidelberg Spectralis Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Machine 91%
- Association between Cognitive Function and Large Optic Nerve Cupping, Accounting for Cup-Disc-Ratio Genetic Risk Score 91%
- Development of the Advised Protocol for OCT Study Terminology and Elements Anterior Segment OCT extension reporting guidelines: APOSTEL-AS 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The tryptophan catabolite or kynurenine pathway in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- The Association Between SLIT2 in Human Vitreous Humor and Plasma and Neurocognitive Test Scores 93%
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with young-onset dementia and their informal caregivers: a systematic review with meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic review protocol: Quantitative susceptibility mapping of brain iron accumulation in neurodegenerative diseases. 89%
- Nigral volumetric and microstructural measures in individuals with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit 89%
- Gene editing preserves visual function in a mouse model of retinal degeneration 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of OCT biomarker changes in treatment-naive neovascular AMD using a deep semantic segmentation algorithm 91%
- Association of renal function with diabetic retinopathy and macular edema among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 89%
- An Open-Source Dataset Of Anti-Vegf Therapy In Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients Over Four Years & Their Visual Outcomes 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.