A Distribution-aware Semi-Supervised Pipeline for Cost-effective Neuron Segmentation in Volume Electron Microscopy
Zhang, Y.; Zhai, H.; Guo, J.; Liu, J.; Xie, Q.; Han, H.
Show abstract
Semi-supervised learning offers a cost-effective approach for neuron segmentation in electron microscopy (EM) volumes. This technique leverages extensive unlabeled data to regularize supervised training for more robust predictions of neuron boundaries. However, the distribution mismatch between labeled and unlabeled data, due to limited annotations and diverse neuronal structures, can cause unreliable predictions on unlabeled data, thus limiting the generalization of semi-supervised models. In this paper, we develop a distribution-aware pipeline to address the inherent mismatch issue and enhance semi-supervised neuron segmentation in EM volumes. At the data level, we propose an unsupervised heuristic to select valuable sub-volumes as labeled data based on distribution similarity in a pretrained feature space, ensuring a representative coverage of neuronal structures. At the model level, we introduce an axial-through mixing strategy into anisotropic neuron segmentation and integrate it into a semi-supervised framework. Building on this, we establish cross-view consistency constraints through intra- and inter-mixing of labeled and unlabeled data, which facilitates the learning of shared semantics across distributions. Extensive experiments on public EM datasets from multiple species, imaging modalities, and resolutions demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Codes and demos are available at https://github.com/yanchaoz/SL-SSNS.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Track-To-Learn: A general framework for tractography with deep reinforcement learning 94%
- Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images 93%
- STAMP: Simultaneous Training and Model Pruning for Low Data Regimes in Medical Image Segmentation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.