Study protocol for "Transportability of patient outcomes from a US clinical trial to real-world populations - a case study using Lung-MAP S1400I (NCT02785952)"
Gupta, A.
Show abstract
2.BackgroundThe external validity of results from clinical trials to routine clinical practice is often questioned. This is sometimes because certain real world patient groups are excluded or underrepresented in clinical trials, or because standards of care in trials are different from those in real-world populations globally. This lack of external validity of trial results manifests as an efficacy-effectiveness gap. In this study, we aim to address the question of whether it is possible to extend results from a clinical trial to real-world populations across different countries. To do this, we use the Lung-MAP nonmatch sub-study S1400I trial (NCT02785952) as a case study. SettingSquamous cell lung carcinoma is a subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 25-30% of cases. Compared to other NSCLC subtypes such as adenocarcinoma, the presence of actionable genetic variants is less common and there are fewer targeted therapies available for advanced/metastatic NSCLC (aNSCLC) of squamous subtype. Patients with squamous aNSCLC who progress on front-line chemotherapy commonly receive immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab. The Lung-MAP nonmatch sub-study S1400I (NCT02785952) compared overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent/stage IV squamous NSCLC randomized to receive either nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab + ipilimumab combination therapy and found no significant difference in mortality rates between these groups. The trial included patients from the United States only. ObjectivesThe goal of this study is to evaluate the transportability of results from NCT02785952 in United States patients to real-world populations in the United States, Germany, France, England and Japan. Using individual-level data for OS from NCT02785952, we will adjust for baseline characteristics from published studies of real-world populations in these countries and benchmark the predicted OS against Kaplan-Meier estimates reported by these studies for patients with squamous cell aNSCLC treated with nivolumab. Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured prognostic variables will be performed.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 95%
- UKCTOCS Update: Applying insights of delayed effects in cancer screening trials to the long-term follow-up mortality analysis 94%
- Supporting Reanalysis and Reuse of Clinical Trial Data: A Case Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 94%
- Reproducibility and transparency characteristics of oncology research evidence 93%
- Selumetinib in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory RAS-pathway mutated paediatric and adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (SeluDex): study protocol for an international, parallel-group, dose-finding with expansion phase I/II trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using numerical modelling and simulation to assess the ethical burden in clinical trials and how it relates to the proportion of responders in a trial sample 94%
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 94%
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strength of Statistical Evidence for the Efficacy of Cancer Drugs: A Bayesian Re-Analysis of Trials Supporting FDA Approval 94%
- Income inequality and access to advanced immunotherapy for lung cancer: the case of Durvalumab in the Netherlands 94%
- Results dissemination from clinical trials conducted at German university medical centres was delayed and incomplete 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 92%
- The impact of lag time to cancer diagnosis and treatment on clinical outcomes prior to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses 92%
- Effects of Side-Effect Risk Framing Strategies on COVID-19 Vaccine Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.