Back

Lumped parameter simulations of cervical lymphatic vessels: dynamics of murine cerebrospinal fluid efflux from the skull

Kim, D.; Tithof, J.

2024-08-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.05.24.595806 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGrowing evidence suggests that for rodents, a substantial fraction of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drains by crossing the cribriform plate into the nasopharengeal lymphatics, eventually reaching the cervical lymphatic vessels (CLVs). Disruption of this drainage pathway is associated with various neurological disorders. MethodsWe employ a lumped parameter method to numerically model CSF drainage across the cribriform plate to CLVs. Our model uses intracranial pressure as an inlet pressure and central venous blood pressure as an outlet pressure. The model incorporates initial lymphatic vessels (modeling those in the nasal region) that absorb the CSF and collecting lymphatic vessels (modeling CLVs) to transport the CSF against an adverse pressure gradient. To determine unknown parameters such as wall stiffness and valve properties, we utilize a Monte Carlo approach and validate our simulation against recent in vivo experimental measurements. ResultsOur parameter analysis reveals the physical characteristics of CLVs. Our results suggest that the stiffness of the vessel wall and the closing state of the valve are crucial for maintaining the vessel size and volume flow rate observed in vivo. We find that a decreased contraction amplitude and frequency leads to a reduction in volume flow rate, and we test the effects of varying the different pressures acting on the CLVs. Finally, we provide evidence that branching of initial lymphatic vessels may deviate from Murrays law to reduce sensitivity to elevated intracranial pressure. ConclusionsThis is the first numerical study of CSF drainage through CLVs. Our comprehensive parameter analysis offers guidance for future numerical modeling of CLVs. This study also provides a foundation for understanding physiology of CSF drainage, helping guide future experimental studies aimed at identifying causal mechanisms of reduction in CLV transport and potential therapeutic approaches to enhance flow.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.9%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.5%
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.1%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
8
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
12
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
13
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
27
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%