Back

Finding novel vulnerabilities of hypomorphic BRCA1 alleles

Schreuder, A.; de Lint, K.; Gois, M. M.; Kampen, R. A.; San Martin Alonso, M.; Nootenboom, I.; Garzero, V.; Wolthuis, R. M. F.; Noordermeer, S. M.

2024-05-28 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.05.24.595688 bioRxiv
Show abstract

With the recent rise in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome-wide synthetic lethality screens, many new synthetic lethal targets have been identified for diseases with underlying genetic causes such as tumours with BRCA1 mutations. Such screens often use full deficiency of a protein to identify novel vulnerabilities. However, patient-derived mutations not only result in loss of the protein but often also concern missense mutations with hypomorphic phenotypes. Here we study the genetic vulnerabilities of two previously described hypomorphic BRCA1 missense mutations and compare these to a BRCA1-depleted setting to study whether this affects screening for synthetic lethal interactions. Our research showed that BRCA1I26A mutated cells have very similar vulnerabilities to BRCA1 wildtype cells, confirming its low tumorigenic effect. In contrast, the BRCA1R1699Q mutation induced a more similar phenotype to BRCA1-deficient cells. For this mutation, we also unveiled a unique vulnerability to the loss of NDE1. Specifically in BRCA1R1699Q mutated cells, and not BRCA1-proficient or -deficient cells, NDE1 loss leads to increased genomic instability. Altogether our findings highlight the importance to differentiate between patient-derived mutations when assessing novel treatment targets.

Published in Molecular Oncology (predicted rank #14) · training set

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.