Adhesion of E. coli bacteria is force-modulated due to fimbriae-mediated surface repulsion and multivalent binding irrespective of surface specificity
Lundgren, A. O.; van Oostrum, P. D. J.; Iturri, J.; Malkoch, M.; Toca-Herrara, J. L.; Reimhult, E.
Show abstract
Escherichia coli bacteria that express type 1 fimbriae migrate along surfaces when pushed by a slow flow but stick more firmly when the flow increases. This and other examples of force-modulated biological binding are often described as due to lectin-glycan catch-bonds. Here we quantitatively track the 3D movements of fimbriated E. coli flowing over surfaces nanopatterned with mannose or hydrophobic binding sites. We reveal that flow-modulated surface adhesion and motion are consequences of bacteria adhering via polydisperse, elastic fimbriae, irrespective of binding affinity and specificity. The fimbria-mediated surface repulsion and the flow forces on tethered bacteria establish an equilibrium bacteria-surface separation. The separation controls the number of potential tethers between the bacterium and the surface. Combined with the individual fimbria affinity, this determines the surface avidity and surface motion. This provides a broadly applicable mechanism by which bacteria acquire adaptive surface avidity, responding super-selectively to different flow environments, concentration, and affinity of available binding sites, essential to explaining how fimbriae govern tropism and surface colonization.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adhesion force spectroscopy with nanostructured colloidal probes reveals nanotopography-dependent early mechanotransductive interactions at the cell membrane level 96%
- Transport among protocells via tunneling nanotubes 96%
- Thermoplasmonic nano-rupture of cells reveals Annexin V function in plasma membrane repair 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.