Top-down and bottom-up interactions rely on nested brain oscillations.
Trajkovic, J.; Veniero, D.; Hanslmayr, S.; Palva, S.; Cruz, G.; Romei, V.; Thut, G.
Show abstract
Adaptive visual processing is enabled through the dynamic interplay between top-down and bottom-up (feedback/feedforward) information exchange, presumably propagated through brain oscillations. Here we causally tested for the oscillatory mechanisms governing this interaction in the visual system. Using concurrent TMS-EEG, we emulated top-down signals by a single TMS-pulse over the Frontal Eye Field (right-FEF), while manipulating the strength of sensory input through the presentation of moving concentric gratings (compared to a control-TMS site). FEF-TMS without sensory input led to a top-down controlled occipital phase-realignment, alongside higher fronto-occipital phase-connectivity, in the alpha/beta-band. Sensory input in the absence of FEF-TMS increased occipital gamma activity. Crucially, testing the interaction between top-down and bottom-up processes (FEF-TMS during sensory input) revealed an increased nesting of the bottom-up gamma activity in the alpha/beta-band cycles. This establishes a causal link between phase-to-power coupling and top-down modulation of feedforward signals, providing novel mechanistic insights into how attention interacts with sensory input at the neural level, shaping rhythmic sampling.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Working memory enhancement using real-time phase-tuned transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
- Parietal alpha stimulation causally enhances attentional information coding in evoked and oscillatory activity 96%
- Phase-specific manipulation of neural oscillatory activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lateral Prefrontal Theta Oscillations Causally Drive a Computational Mechanism Underlying Conflict Expectation and Adaptation 96%
- Integrating electric field modelling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects 96%
- Perturbing human V1 degrades the fidelity of visual working memory 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.