Hydroxychloroquine treatment for recurrent pregnancy loss: a study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Talbot, A. L.; Egerup, P.; Lunoee, A. L.; Jensen, K. K.; Chonovitsch, M. L. T.; Korsholm, A.-S.; Behrendt-Moeller, I.; Hartwig, T. S.; Westergaard, D.; Vomstein, K.; Larsen, E. C.; Fischer, B. M.; Nielsen, H. S.
Show abstract
IntroductionPregnancy loss occurs in 25% of all pregnancies. While 50-60% of the pregnancy losses are due to fetal chromosomal and structural abnormalities, incompatible with life, some of the remaining euploid pregnancy losses are likely caused by maternal conditions. At least 2% of all women suffer [≥]3 consecutive pregnancy losses, defined as recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). A hyperactive maternal immune system has been suspected to be responsible for rejection of healthy fetuses and be the underlying cause for unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. However, very sparsely evidence-based treatment is available. The anti-inflammatory immune modulatory effects of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and casuistic reports of live births by women with previous RPL after HCQ-treatment, have given rise to several hypothesizes for HCQs impact on RPL. In this multicenter randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (db-RCT) we aim to uncover whether HCQ can increase the live birth rate (LBR) in women with RPL, thus laying the foundation for an evidence-based treatment to make a real difference for a much-overlooked group of patients. Methods and analysisWe will assess HCQ treatment in women with a minimum of four consecutive unexplained pregnancy losses (or three pregnancy losses including a second trimester pregnancy loss), and monitor a potential difference in LBR among women allocated treatment with HCQ and placebo, without exclusion of any included patients (Intention to treat analysis) and with exclusion of those with ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy loss due to chromosome abnormalities, neglect of treatment, induced abortion or those who withdraw from the treatment earlier than the protocol dictates (per protocol analysis). Secondary outcome measures include comparison of the rate of perinatal complications in the intervention group to the placebo group and examination of inflammatory and immunological mechanisms in peripheral blood. We aim to include 186 patients in the db-RCT. In addition, we will in a sub-study with 10 women monitor metabolic activity measured by ultra-low dose FDG-PET/CT scans before and during pregnancy. Metabolic activity correlates with grade of inflammation and will be measured in the uterus and immune-related tissue such as bone marrow, spleen, thymus, and lymph nodes. Ethics and DisseminationThe db-RCT including the PET/CT sub-study has been approved by The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics, The Danish Medicines Agency, The Danish Data Protection Agency, and transferred to The Center for Data handling Capital Region of Denmark in May 2024. The trial conforms to good clinical practice guidelines (GCP) and has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03305263). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and at professional conferences. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIAssessment of HCQ treatment in women with RPL to potentially increase LBR. C_LIO_LIAssessment of the rate of perinatal outcomes associability with HCQ treatment. C_LIO_LIRPL trials so far have struggled to obtain pregnancy tissue from PL and if obtained been severely contaminated with maternal tissue. We will use circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA), isolated from maternal peripheral blood for fetal genetic diagnostics as we demonstrated feasible in our recent Lancet publication. C_LIO_LINon-invasive monitoring of inflammation in the uterus before and during pregnancy by the means of ultra-low dose PET/CT scans. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 92%
- Landscape Analysis of Pregnancy Exposure Registries in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Scoping Review 92%
- The German Gestational Diabetes Study (PREG): Rationale, Methodology and Design 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort profile: The Bristol IVF Study- A longitudinal study of women, their partners and treatment outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies 94%
- Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK 93%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association study meta-analysis supports association between MUC1 and ectopic pregnancy 91%
- Ovarian follicular function is not altered by SARS-Cov-2 infection or BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination 91%
- Stratifying IVF population endometria using a prognosis gradient independent of endometrial timing. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Smoking during pregnancy and its effect on placental weight: A Mendelian randomization study 92%
- Social inequalities in pregnancy metabolic profile: findings from the multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort study 92%
- Reduction in Spontaneous and Iatrogenic Preterm Births in Twin Pregnancies During COVID-19 Lockdown in Melbourne, Australia: A Multicenter Cohort Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 92%
- Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection 92%
- Assessing the impact of maternal blood pressure during pregnancy on perinatal health: A wide-angled Mendelian randomization study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.